Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's amazing how fast we moved from defund the police to refund the police [View all]ck4829
(38,113 posts)32. Oh. Oh, maybe you'll answer the question then, since he didn't
So when they're enforcing state-sponsored sexism and control of a woman's body
What are we supposed to call it?
What's your name for it?
https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16775357
What's it going to be when this happens?
Enforcing Criminal Abortion Bans Post-Roe: A Massive Escalation of Surveillance
New York-based privacy group Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.) released a chilling report last month detailing the digital surveillance threats facing pregnant women who seek abortion information and services, and how these threats could escalate dramatically if the Supreme Court repeals abortion rights and states criminalize abortion. Police, prosecutors and private anti-abortion litigants will weaponize existing American surveillance infrastructure to target pregnant people and use their health data against them in a court of law, according to the report, titled Pregnancy Panopticon: Abortion Surveillance After Roe. This isnt speculationits already happening. The report explains how anti-abortion governments and private entities are already using cutting-edge digital technologies to surveil womens search history, location data, messages, online purchases and social media activities by using geofencing, keyword warrants, big data and more. Every aspect of pregnant peoples digital lives will be put under the microscope, examined for any hints that they sought (successfully or otherwise) to end their pregnancy, states the report.
https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16775726
So, when they're using funds to spend hours poring over a woman's social media messages and using her phone's GPS to see where she went because she might have had an abortion, then... What. Are. We. Supposed. To. Call. It?
If my mistake was calling this fascism, then correct me, what should it be called?
Freedom?
What are we supposed to call it?
What's your name for it?
https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16775357
What's it going to be when this happens?
Enforcing Criminal Abortion Bans Post-Roe: A Massive Escalation of Surveillance
New York-based privacy group Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.) released a chilling report last month detailing the digital surveillance threats facing pregnant women who seek abortion information and services, and how these threats could escalate dramatically if the Supreme Court repeals abortion rights and states criminalize abortion. Police, prosecutors and private anti-abortion litigants will weaponize existing American surveillance infrastructure to target pregnant people and use their health data against them in a court of law, according to the report, titled Pregnancy Panopticon: Abortion Surveillance After Roe. This isnt speculationits already happening. The report explains how anti-abortion governments and private entities are already using cutting-edge digital technologies to surveil womens search history, location data, messages, online purchases and social media activities by using geofencing, keyword warrants, big data and more. Every aspect of pregnant peoples digital lives will be put under the microscope, examined for any hints that they sought (successfully or otherwise) to end their pregnancy, states the report.
https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16775726
So, when they're using funds to spend hours poring over a woman's social media messages and using her phone's GPS to see where she went because she might have had an abortion, then... What. Are. We. Supposed. To. Call. It?
If my mistake was calling this fascism, then correct me, what should it be called?
Freedom?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's amazing how fast we moved from defund the police to refund the police [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Jun 2022
OP
Point 1: I'm not aware that police are responsible for enforcing abortion laws
brooklynite
Jun 2022
#25
That phrase should be attributed to the man refusing to pay his $2mil police protection fees
Pyryck
Jun 2022
#11
Too many people think that one more increased budget cycle will fix the problems the police have.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 2022
#12
Defund was never a policy. Why did every republican vote no on INCREASED funding for police
onecaliberal
Jun 2022
#14
I think the 'defund' movement has a point in that police can useless and detrimental
In It to Win It
Jun 2022
#21