Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

crickets

(26,168 posts)
18. For what it's worth:
Fri Jun 10, 2022, 04:50 PM
Jun 2022



Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney
And now DOJ gives a clue about why the committee might not want to hand over transcripts: When it gets them, DOJ says it will provide those transcripts to defense attorneys as part of its discovery obligations.
3:21 PM · Jun 9, 2022





Mueller, She Wrote @MuellerSheWrote
Replying to @kyledcheney
Why would providing transcripts to defense attorneys make the committee not want to hand them over?
4:21 PM · Jun 9, 2022





Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney
Replying to @seditiontrack and @MuellerSheWrote
Because once the universe of people with access to the transcripts gets larger, the ability of the committee to control that information and assure it doesn't leak is diminished. Right now, they have a monopoly over it, once it's in DOJ's hands, they lose that contorl.
4:28 PM · Jun 9, 2022


I can see both sides of the argument here, leaning slightly to the committee. Leaks could destroy what they're attempting to do in persuading the American public that tfg and great gobs of the GOP tried to coup. The committee will hand over everything. Just not yet.

But Thompson also told reporters last month the committee may allow some materials requested to be reviewed in the panel’s offices.


This sounds like a reasonable potential workaround. A limited number of eyes would be allowed, and any leaks could immediately be traced to the perpetrator/s.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #1
they're not waiting bigtree Jun 2022 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #19
They've had 18 months. Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #2
they can't hurry grand juries, and they don't control the time it takes to fight challenges bigtree Jun 2022 #4
They haven't had 18 months, they've had barely six months Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #9
Wow!!!! MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2022 #14
. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #5
the total number of potential witnesses sought after by the grand jury could reach into the hundreds bigtree Jun 2022 #6
Stir, stir, stir. Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #7
I have more than cynicism, snark, and emojis bigtree Jun 2022 #11
Thank You for the valuable summary on the important issue of cooperation between DOJ & J6 committee Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #8
I'm like gathering swirling leaves into a pile that's getting jumped in and kicked about bigtree Jun 2022 #15
Looks like the DOJ is champing at the bit in order to get these materials Novara Jun 2022 #10
they are managing a swirl of witnesses and defendants bigtree Jun 2022 #12
+1 Novara Jun 2022 #13
Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2022 #16
kick bigtree Jun 2022 #17
For what it's worth: crickets Jun 2022 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #20
the only ones they didn't enforce were Meadows and Scavino bigtree Jun 2022 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DOJ is working as hard as...»Reply #18