General Discussion

OneGrassRoot

(23,953 posts)

46. Great point. If one were a ...

Thu Jun 16, 2022, 03:20 PM

Jun 2022

“conspiracy theorist” it could be speculated that it’s a coordinated strategy by DOJ and the committee to squeeze more people into turning and/or ramp up the fear in Trump & Co. I don’t think Garland would do that but I’d like to daydream that this whole thing has been veryyyyy carefully choreographed.

😊

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

110 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WOW: DOJ wrote to select committee yesterday saying committee is hampering criminal investigation [View all] kpete Jun 2022 OP

What is cilla4progress Jun 2022 #1

Huge amounts of evidence, obtained by EACH branch. elleng Jun 2022 #4

Huge amount of evidence, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #12

Seems like the DOJ doesn't know how to interview witnesses JohnSJ Jun 2022 #7

Looks like to me the DOJ is beginning construction on a tower of horseshit and gunsmoke, Magoo48 Jun 2022 #37

Don't be shy; tell us who to blame. brooklynite Jun 2022 #105

Until such time I am hopefully proven wrong, I will remain skeptical. Magoo48 Jun 2022 #110

If that is accurate then the DOJ isn't doing their job. Why isn't the DOJ interviewing those JohnSJ Jun 2022 #2

It will save a lot of time to choose which witnesses they want to interview Bev54 Jun 2022 #19

Maybe the DOJ can't be trusted lostnfound Jun 2022 #42

how a case is put together azureblue Jun 2022 #87

Good points. Thank you. wnylib Jun 2022 #109

+1 Parts of the DOJ cannot. n/t TeamProg Jun 2022 #94

Have they not chosen yet? Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #101

I'm disposed to trust the work of the committee at this point over DOJ but... jcgoldie Jun 2022 #35

I don't mind it if they are ready to indict those people. Claustrum Jun 2022 #3

WITF?! The Committee doesn't work for DOJ! 50 Shades Of Blue Jun 2022 #5

Hey DOJ choie Jun 2022 #6

Dick move, DOJ! dchill Jun 2022 #8

Someone there must be able to type real fast!! usonian Jun 2022 #9

Wow, looks to me like DOJ should have started investigations a year ago. gab13by13 Jun 2022 #10

If I was sitting on the fence for Jan 6 culpability, Jarqui Jun 2022 #11

Please interpret your post, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #14

There are bound to be different degrees of guilt here Jarqui Jun 2022 #22

Why did Laurence Tribe gab13by13 Jun 2022 #28

You'll have to ask Lawrence Jarqui Jun 2022 #76

This message was self-deleted by its author Timewas Jun 2022 #27

Just repeating what Merrick Garland said, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #30

Presumably that poster doesn't want the Committee to make criminal referrals onenote Jun 2022 #55

Come on guys! newdayneeded Jun 2022 #13

Don't forget defending Trump gab13by13 Jun 2022 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #53

Does the DOJ prosecute the deceased? sop Jun 2022 #15

It takes a long time to get ducks in a row, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #18

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #54

Sounds like... JoeOtterbein Jun 2022 #16

Let's cut to the chase, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #20

Last I saw the FBI was the investigative arm of the DOJ bottrott Jun 2022 #21

Wrong. onenote Jun 2022 #40

Not in my estimation bottrott Jun 2022 #78

Why don't they conduct parallel investigations? They ARE conducting parallel investigation onenote Jun 2022 #79

I think you may have misread bottrott Jun 2022 #106

Your words: onenote Jun 2022 #107

Merrick Garland kacekwl Jun 2022 #23

There is no question about that. gab13by13 Jun 2022 #31

projection? NewHendoLib Jun 2022 #24

WTF ? CentralMass Jun 2022 #25

I think some of you have it backwards Novara Jun 2022 #26

Where is this fairytale land you speak of ? I must visit. OnDoutside Jun 2022 #29

Pretty sad state of affairs, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #32

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #57

that's fiction bigtree Jun 2022 #93

Novara has it exactly right. onenote Jun 2022 #36

What we've been CONSTANTLY told on DU is DOJ is doing their own thing and not dependent on uponit7771 Jun 2022 #59

And what the DOJ said in those documents confirms they are doing their own investigation onenote Jun 2022 #69

"How is that a bad thing?" on the face of it sets up a needless dependency. There are too many ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #75

that's just wrong bigtree Jun 2022 #98

I never claimed they went into court without their own evidence. I'm claiming we've been ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #99

I don't know where you mashed that up from but it's not accurate bigtree Jun 2022 #104

The DOJ is investigating. They need the witness interviews the committee has. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #33

We know DOJ is investigating the Proud Boys, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #84

Did anyone complaining that DOJ should do their own investigation onenote Jun 2022 #34

lol. I just posted much the same. 👍 n/t OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #39

Thank you, thank you, thank you. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #41

I was just about to post similar - thank you Yonnie3 Jun 2022 #49

Help me out here... OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #38

Lol. It looks like the Garland will do nothing crowd has caught up. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #60

You mean by DOJ traitors? n/t OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #64

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #65

This implies the Committee is highly legit and thorough and Baked Potato Jun 2022 #44

Just a guess. The committee may want to finish their hearings before turning over their evidence. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #45

Yes, agreed. Baked Potato Jun 2022 #48

+1, uponit7771 Jun 2022 #68

Great point. If one were a ... OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #46

IMO, it is all very methodically planned and being worked Baked Potato Jun 2022 #47

Well, good. I'm gonna continue... OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #51

I certainly don't think it is all a waste of time. Pretty serious business. Baked Potato Jun 2022 #58

I hope you're right. BlueLucy Jun 2022 #61

If it weren't for the committee, we'd know nothing about the events of Jan 6 iemanja Jun 2022 #50

Where does DOJ say there is a conflict? onenote Jun 2022 #52

Here: iemanja Jun 2022 #67

That's some weak shit there, all this info was going to come out anyway and the DOJ knew the timing uponit7771 Jun 2022 #70

My question exactly. iemanja Jun 2022 #72

And DOJ is right. It would threaten their prosecutions onenote Jun 2022 #71

I don't understand why the committee wouldn't give them iemanja Jun 2022 #74

**********WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK !!!********* Why doesn't the DOJ have their OWN ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #62

They do. Apparently you missed the point. onenote Jun 2022 #77

No I didn't miss the point, I've been told on DU 123431 times DOJ has its own investigation and .. uponit7771 Jun 2022 #81

Again. DOJ is doing its own investigations. onenote Jun 2022 #88

Independent investigations? Also the 1st DOJ memo in the OP doesn't say what you claiming as the uponit7771 Jun 2022 #89

You tried. some people won't listen. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #92

The DOJ's waited this long, it can wait longer, and give the Jan 6 Comte its DUE PROCESS. ancianita Jun 2022 #63

RIGHT !!! There's too much wrong with this memo, if DOJ was on step they'd be ahead of J6C not uponit7771 Jun 2022 #66

Doesn't really matter, anyway, because of course they'll get their shit. ancianita Jun 2022 #80

Agreed which is why I'm kinda of miffed the DOJ doesn't have a 10 billion dollar budget to get more uponit7771 Jun 2022 #82

It's DEFINITELY underfunded to handle the messes it's been left. ancianita Jun 2022 #91

+1, I was thinking the first day was the big explosion. I OP'd talking to a MAGA about the fake TFG uponit7771 Jun 2022 #95

I thought it was fast out of the gate. But THIS one is the hard, definitive proof of crimeS ancianita Jun 2022 #97

DOJ will use this as an excuse to Not prosecute. sarcasmo Jun 2022 #73

J6 committee and DoJ Deminpenn Jun 2022 #83

So is DOJ setting up an excuse for not moving faster on the criminal investigation? housecat Jun 2022 #85

This message was self-deleted by its author spanone Jun 2022 #86

Do you watch the news? fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #90

And you are who? spanone Jun 2022 #96

no it doesn't bigtree Jun 2022 #102

Are they wanting to see if their witnesses said one thing to the January 6 com and another to them? herding cats Jun 2022 #100

conflicting testimony can be incriminating bigtree Jun 2022 #103

AG George B McClellan is proceeding with all due haste. Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #108