General Discussion

ancianita

(43,307 posts)

97. I thought it was fast out of the gate. But THIS one is the hard, definitive proof of crimeS

Thu Jun 16, 2022, 04:34 PM

Jun 2022

and won't even be a challenge to DOJ prosecutors anymore.

Yeah, there were more -- whatever number of electors each state was entitled to TIMES ten states.

Suicide? heh heh... well, I think they'll live to keep making money even if they lose their jobs.

OH, WAY more than 8 -- 138 Republicans of the House, too. Don't forget it was a joint session.

If charges are made against Trump before November 8, THEN all those 147 can ALSO be charged for aiding and abetting whatever charges are brought against Trump. They'll have to spend a lot to each lawyer up and make whatever deals they can devise. All this should help Dems win the midterms.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

110 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WOW: DOJ wrote to select committee yesterday saying committee is hampering criminal investigation [View all] kpete Jun 2022 OP

What is cilla4progress Jun 2022 #1

Huge amounts of evidence, obtained by EACH branch. elleng Jun 2022 #4

Huge amount of evidence, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #12

Seems like the DOJ doesn't know how to interview witnesses JohnSJ Jun 2022 #7

Looks like to me the DOJ is beginning construction on a tower of horseshit and gunsmoke, Magoo48 Jun 2022 #37

Don't be shy; tell us who to blame. brooklynite Jun 2022 #105

Until such time I am hopefully proven wrong, I will remain skeptical. Magoo48 Jun 2022 #110

If that is accurate then the DOJ isn't doing their job. Why isn't the DOJ interviewing those JohnSJ Jun 2022 #2

It will save a lot of time to choose which witnesses they want to interview Bev54 Jun 2022 #19

Maybe the DOJ can't be trusted lostnfound Jun 2022 #42

how a case is put together azureblue Jun 2022 #87

Good points. Thank you. wnylib Jun 2022 #109

+1 Parts of the DOJ cannot. n/t TeamProg Jun 2022 #94

Have they not chosen yet? Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #101

I'm disposed to trust the work of the committee at this point over DOJ but... jcgoldie Jun 2022 #35

I don't mind it if they are ready to indict those people. Claustrum Jun 2022 #3

WITF?! The Committee doesn't work for DOJ! 50 Shades Of Blue Jun 2022 #5

Hey DOJ choie Jun 2022 #6

Dick move, DOJ! dchill Jun 2022 #8

Someone there must be able to type real fast!! usonian Jun 2022 #9

Wow, looks to me like DOJ should have started investigations a year ago. gab13by13 Jun 2022 #10

If I was sitting on the fence for Jan 6 culpability, Jarqui Jun 2022 #11

Please interpret your post, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #14

There are bound to be different degrees of guilt here Jarqui Jun 2022 #22

Why did Laurence Tribe gab13by13 Jun 2022 #28

You'll have to ask Lawrence Jarqui Jun 2022 #76

This message was self-deleted by its author Timewas Jun 2022 #27

Just repeating what Merrick Garland said, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #30

Presumably that poster doesn't want the Committee to make criminal referrals onenote Jun 2022 #55

Come on guys! newdayneeded Jun 2022 #13

Don't forget defending Trump gab13by13 Jun 2022 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #53

Does the DOJ prosecute the deceased? sop Jun 2022 #15

It takes a long time to get ducks in a row, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #18

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #54

Sounds like... JoeOtterbein Jun 2022 #16

Let's cut to the chase, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #20

Last I saw the FBI was the investigative arm of the DOJ bottrott Jun 2022 #21

Wrong. onenote Jun 2022 #40

Not in my estimation bottrott Jun 2022 #78

Why don't they conduct parallel investigations? They ARE conducting parallel investigation onenote Jun 2022 #79

I think you may have misread bottrott Jun 2022 #106

Your words: onenote Jun 2022 #107

Merrick Garland kacekwl Jun 2022 #23

There is no question about that. gab13by13 Jun 2022 #31

projection? NewHendoLib Jun 2022 #24

WTF ? CentralMass Jun 2022 #25

I think some of you have it backwards Novara Jun 2022 #26

Where is this fairytale land you speak of ? I must visit. OnDoutside Jun 2022 #29

Pretty sad state of affairs, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #32

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #57

that's fiction bigtree Jun 2022 #93

Novara has it exactly right. onenote Jun 2022 #36

What we've been CONSTANTLY told on DU is DOJ is doing their own thing and not dependent on uponit7771 Jun 2022 #59

And what the DOJ said in those documents confirms they are doing their own investigation onenote Jun 2022 #69

"How is that a bad thing?" on the face of it sets up a needless dependency. There are too many ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #75

that's just wrong bigtree Jun 2022 #98

I never claimed they went into court without their own evidence. I'm claiming we've been ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #99

I don't know where you mashed that up from but it's not accurate bigtree Jun 2022 #104

The DOJ is investigating. They need the witness interviews the committee has. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #33

We know DOJ is investigating the Proud Boys, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #84

Did anyone complaining that DOJ should do their own investigation onenote Jun 2022 #34

lol. I just posted much the same. 👍 n/t OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #39

Thank you, thank you, thank you. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #41

I was just about to post similar - thank you Yonnie3 Jun 2022 #49

Help me out here... OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #38

Lol. It looks like the Garland will do nothing crowd has caught up. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #43

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #60

You mean by DOJ traitors? n/t OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #64

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #65

This implies the Committee is highly legit and thorough and Baked Potato Jun 2022 #44

Just a guess. The committee may want to finish their hearings before turning over their evidence. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #45

Yes, agreed. Baked Potato Jun 2022 #48

+1, uponit7771 Jun 2022 #68

Great point. If one were a ... OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #46

IMO, it is all very methodically planned and being worked Baked Potato Jun 2022 #47

Well, good. I'm gonna continue... OneGrassRoot Jun 2022 #51

I certainly don't think it is all a waste of time. Pretty serious business. Baked Potato Jun 2022 #58

I hope you're right. BlueLucy Jun 2022 #61

If it weren't for the committee, we'd know nothing about the events of Jan 6 iemanja Jun 2022 #50

Where does DOJ say there is a conflict? onenote Jun 2022 #52

Here: iemanja Jun 2022 #67

That's some weak shit there, all this info was going to come out anyway and the DOJ knew the timing uponit7771 Jun 2022 #70

My question exactly. iemanja Jun 2022 #72

And DOJ is right. It would threaten their prosecutions onenote Jun 2022 #71

I don't understand why the committee wouldn't give them iemanja Jun 2022 #74

**********WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK !!!********* Why doesn't the DOJ have their OWN ... uponit7771 Jun 2022 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #62

They do. Apparently you missed the point. onenote Jun 2022 #77

No I didn't miss the point, I've been told on DU 123431 times DOJ has its own investigation and .. uponit7771 Jun 2022 #81

Again. DOJ is doing its own investigations. onenote Jun 2022 #88

Independent investigations? Also the 1st DOJ memo in the OP doesn't say what you claiming as the uponit7771 Jun 2022 #89

You tried. some people won't listen. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #92

The DOJ's waited this long, it can wait longer, and give the Jan 6 Comte its DUE PROCESS. ancianita Jun 2022 #63

RIGHT !!! There's too much wrong with this memo, if DOJ was on step they'd be ahead of J6C not uponit7771 Jun 2022 #66

Doesn't really matter, anyway, because of course they'll get their shit. ancianita Jun 2022 #80

Agreed which is why I'm kinda of miffed the DOJ doesn't have a 10 billion dollar budget to get more uponit7771 Jun 2022 #82

It's DEFINITELY underfunded to handle the messes it's been left. ancianita Jun 2022 #91

+1, I was thinking the first day was the big explosion. I OP'd talking to a MAGA about the fake TFG uponit7771 Jun 2022 #95

I thought it was fast out of the gate. But THIS one is the hard, definitive proof of crimeS ancianita Jun 2022 #97

DOJ will use this as an excuse to Not prosecute. sarcasmo Jun 2022 #73

J6 committee and DoJ Deminpenn Jun 2022 #83

So is DOJ setting up an excuse for not moving faster on the criminal investigation? housecat Jun 2022 #85

This message was self-deleted by its author spanone Jun 2022 #86

Do you watch the news? fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #90

And you are who? spanone Jun 2022 #96

no it doesn't bigtree Jun 2022 #102

Are they wanting to see if their witnesses said one thing to the January 6 com and another to them? herding cats Jun 2022 #100

conflicting testimony can be incriminating bigtree Jun 2022 #103

AG George B McClellan is proceeding with all due haste. Voltaire2 Jun 2022 #108