Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Give Luttig A Break [View all]deucemagnet
(4,549 posts)74. So now I hate stroke victims AND Stephen Hawking?
Having a speech issue has NO reflection upon one's intelligence or integrity. Judge Luttig's integrity, his scholarship, his intelligence are not at question. He is a man with few peers in the lofty circles of Constitutional scholarship.
I have not made any comments disparaging Judge Luttig's intelligence, integrity, or scholarship, only that his verbal communication skills are subpar for a man of his position and that I, personally, in my opinion, found that to be unprofessional.
There are any number of reasons for someone to have speech issues.
Yes, and not all of them are because of disabilities.
And yes, there was concern a few years ago, when he retired early from the bench, that Judge Luttig had had health issues.
If the health issues you mention are due to some sort of neurological condition that affects his speech, then I salute his bravery and wish him continued good health.
However, I suspect that people of your persuasion aren't really interested in being educated, but rather in shooting off their mouths in a childish, arrogant, entitled fashion.
I can't stop you from projecting on me, so think what you will. That was dreadfully delivered testimony, I set the bar higher for someone who graduated law school, passed the bar, and sat on the bench, and I realize that saying this makes me a rat bastard that hates the disabled, Stephen Hawking, and probably kicks puppies. I'm going to die on this hill, so project away.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I believe he is carefully choosing his words, knowing that history will be listening.
Raster
Jun 2022
#35
Are you familiar with a certain actual genius named Stephen Hawking ?
Haggis 4 Breakfast
Jun 2022
#66
He was called to testify. Don't think there was a Public Speaking test he was required to take.
Fla Dem
Jun 2022
#89
My son had a profound speech impediment as a child. One child study team wanted to classify him...
NNadir
Jun 2022
#90
Republicans are stupid, I like how he's deliberately spelling it out for them. Let him speak.
onecaliberal
Jun 2022
#19
I never thought I'd be reading a thread like this, & I've been here for 20 years.
Native
Jun 2022
#38
The intended audience is US AG Garland and the top-DOJ officials who are watching.
Justice matters.
Jun 2022
#54
I think it took him a while to get comfortable, but his content was quite powerful.
patphil
Jun 2022
#47