Judge Luttig reveals why he spoke so slowly at Jan. 6 hearing

[Scrivener7]

16. I totally agree. There have been a lot of comments about how people are wrong

to criticize him. Some say it shows we have to always be entertained. Some say it shows how we always have to have things delivered to us quickly.

Neither of those is true. We need things comprehensible. And, as you say, the guy knew what he was going to be asked, and should have known beforehand what he was going to say. And in other clips of him speaking, he has a totally normal delivery.

In terms purely of his content, I did not think it was clear. As I say, some things he said were great. Some, including a central question of whether there is a historic precedent for the VP to accept an alternate slate of electors, were nearly gibberish.

In terms of his delivery, I am baffled. And, though this does not matter at all, I found it pompous and annoying.