Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(182,068 posts)
59. For this thread
Sun Jun 19, 2022, 01:14 AM
Jun 2022



https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1538266496371245057.html

Thank you so much for this thread, Mr. Hagan, @joehagansays. You almost presciently understood precisely what I was at least attempting to do to the best of my abilities during the hearing Thursday.

What you could not know, and did not know, but I will tell you now, is that I believed I had an obligation to the Select Committee and to the country, first to formulate . . . then to measure . . . and then . . . to meter out . . .
every . . . single . . . word . . . that I spoke . . . , carefully . . . exactingly . . . and . . . deliberately, so that the words I spoke were pristine clear and would be heard, and therefore understood, as such.

I believed Thursday that I had that high responsibility and obligation -- to myself, even if to no other. Also please bear in mind that Thursday was the first time in 68 years, to my knowledge, I had ever been on national television, let alone national television like that.

And though not scared, I was concerned that I do my very best and not embarrass myself, as I think anyone who found themselves in that frightening circumstance would be.

I decided to respond to your at once astute and understanding tweet finally this afternoon, because I have been watching the tweets all day suggesting that I am recovering from a severe stroke, and my friends, out of their concern for me and my family,
have been earnestly forwarding me these tweets, asking me if I am alright. Such is social media, I understand. But I profoundly believe in social media's foundational, in fact revolutionary, value and contribution to Free Speech in our country,
and for that reason I willingly accept the occasional bad that comes from social media, in return for the much more frequent good that comes from it -- at least from the vastly more responsible, respectful speech on those media.

That is why, 16 years after my retirement from the Bench, even then as a very skeptical, curmudgeonly old federal judge, I created a Facebook account and then a Twitter account -- slowly . . . very slowly . . . one account first . . . and then . . . followed . . . by the other.

All of this said, I am not recovering from a stroke or any other malady, I promise. Thankfully, I have never been as sick or as so debilitated as that ever in my life, and would not want that for anyone. Knock on wood, I have never even been really sick a day in my life.

I was more ready, prepared and intellectually focused (I had thought) during Thursday's hearing than I have ever been for anything in my life. I gather my face appeared "too red" for some on Twitter, betraying to them serious illness. The explanation was more innocent than that.

At the last minute, I had been able during the weekend preceding my testimony to help my daughter get settled into her new home, where the temperatures were in the upper 90s, and where I was appreciatively, though unwittingly, to get just a little bit of needed suntan!

What I will say, though, is this. And I think it explains it all. All my life, I have said (as to myself, and at times, by way of sarcastic prescription for others) that I never . . . talk . . . any . . . faster . . . than . . . my . . . mind . . . can . . . think.

I will proudly assure everyone on Twitter that I was riveted, laser-like as never before, on that promise to myself beginning promptly at the hour of 1:00 pm Thursday afternoon.

What is more, as consciously as one can be aware of something subconsciously, I was, in your poetic words of which I was, and am myself, incapable even of conjuring, Mr. Hagan, supremely conscious that,

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Judge Luttig could turn out to be a hero (n/t) PJMcK Jun 2022 #1
His delivery did not help his clarity, and his lack of clarity on the "historic precedent" that Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #2
Sadly true IMO. nt Disaffected Jun 2022 #5
I've testified as an expert witness in hearings before. meadowlander Jun 2022 #14
I totally agree. There have been a lot of comments about how people are wrong Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #16
"i found it pompous and annoying." -- you put it so politely orleans Jun 2022 #53
Totally Agree ProfessorGAC Jun 2022 #19
Agreed Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #68
It says something about us that a lot of people had issues with his delivery Novara Jun 2022 #3
Totally agree Alice Kramden Jun 2022 #7
THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Jun 2022 #8
+1000 llmart Jun 2022 #17
Agree Alice Kramden Jun 2022 #21
but did your pauses distract some people to the degree that they couldn't follow what you were orleans Jun 2022 #54
I can see your point - it just didn't strike me that way Alice Kramden Jun 2022 #62
You describe one of my brothers. callous taoboy Jun 2022 #61
Wow. That's quite a change to go from laid back hippie to MAGA. llmart Jun 2022 #76
... Me. Jun 2022 #27
+1 Totally agree.n/t ChazII Jun 2022 #65
Agree!!! nt pazzyanne Jun 2022 #73
I always knew when Mom was really, really angry. LogicFirst Jun 2022 #4
That's it, exactly Alice Kramden Jun 2022 #6
So was I Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #45
As was I! nt pazzyanne Jun 2022 #74
So was I. dmr Jun 2022 #75
: ) Alice Kramden Jun 2022 #79
Exactly! Rebl2 Jun 2022 #38
First time on TV, too - Alice Kramden Jun 2022 #9
He owes no one an explanation. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2022 #10
Exactly. I appreciated his testimony and the care he livetohike Jun 2022 #18
Every single American should have listened to him on NPR today. He NAILED the republican BComplex Jun 2022 #11
Spot on!! K&R onetexan Jun 2022 #23
What a shame that he felt obligated to explain his cadence mcar Jun 2022 #12
Kicking for visibility SheltieLover Jun 2022 #13
I get it. I listened carefully--about as carefully as he was choosing his words. hlthe2b Jun 2022 #15
Same here. Hortensis Jun 2022 #20
I didn't have any issue with his delivery. LoisB Jun 2022 #22
Neither did I! ShazzieB Jun 2022 #34
I am happy it was deliberate and Dr. Shepper Jun 2022 #24
Same here LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #47
Judicial opinions are usually long and Deminpenn Jun 2022 #25
Cha Ching! As Long as Everyone's Talking About it Beetwasher. Jun 2022 #26
He forced one to concentrate. Otherwise the beginning of his sentence was forgotten before the end. Marcuse Jun 2022 #28
The pauses between words were more like PoindexterOglethorpe Jun 2022 #29
I was not bothered by his delivery. 3catwoman3 Jun 2022 #30
Thank you so much, LMPV! Judge Luttig Cha Jun 2022 #31
As a retired attorney and former law student from the late 80s mentalsolstice Jun 2022 #32
Shit yeah! I was taking notes. And I write fast. calimary Jun 2022 #48
Did better than the 9 on the big bench ! cloudboy07 Jun 2022 #33
That was almost exactly what I said. MuseRider Jun 2022 #35
His intentions may have been honorable, but the execution diluted the intentions Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #36
Judge Luttig's presentation was different, not more not less, just different, and I will find it housecat Jun 2022 #37
He said, and repeated, that Drumpf and his lunatic followers are a danger to this country judesedit Jun 2022 #39
The gravity of the words delivered by Judge Lutting were delivered just right for the occasion... kentuck Jun 2022 #40
Well done judge 👍 Handler Jun 2022 #41
As I have written before, it was his cadence that made me realize how important his testimony was. Dysfunctional Jun 2022 #42
Yes, very powerful. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #44
He was riveting, painstakingly deliberate, and he seemed both heartbroken and very, very angry. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #43
I am a former college debater where everyone speaks as fast as possible LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #46
I thought maybe he was talking slow Tree Lady Jun 2022 #49
Good point Alice Kramden Jun 2022 #51
Kick! Cha Jun 2022 #50
I have absolutely no issue with now this man spoke to America. MontanaMama Jun 2022 #52
8The first time that I heard him speak were normal to me. BigmanPigman Jun 2022 #55
It was distracting for me. Hopefully it was an effective technique ecstatic Jun 2022 #56
it's even more mind numbing reading him bigtree Jun 2022 #57
He was parsing his words too carefully ... aggiesal Jun 2022 #58
This phrasing will be part of history LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #60
For this thread LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #59
I'm glad he overdid it on the slow talk, for a couple of reasons: Paladin Jun 2022 #63
I posted here and elsewhere gibraltar72 Jun 2022 #64
The critique is more telling as to why the nation is "slow rolling" into fascism than anything else. cayugafalls Jun 2022 #66
Based on some comments it seems Dyedinthewoolliberal Jun 2022 #67
Which is exactly what I thought while listening. The Jungle 1 Jun 2022 #69
Patience, Higherarky Jun 2022 #70
That, and though he is too judicious to say so, BobTheSubgenius Jun 2022 #71
That's exactly what I thought he was doing. He wanted the deniers who were listening to fully Martin68 Jun 2022 #72
Slow but Sure dai13sy Jun 2022 #77
He went a bit overboard wryter2000 Jun 2022 #78
Judge Luttig knows that the Repub Party is a "clear and present danger" to our democracy LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Luttig reveals why ...»Reply #59