Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,871 posts)
5. They weren't that far off
Thu Jun 23, 2022, 08:03 AM
Jun 2022

The screen shot is a bit blurry, but I think these are the figures.

"And it’s likely to mark the third straight presidential race in which the Democratic margin out of Philadelphia has shrunk. While Biden will probably improve on Clinton's Philadelphia total by a few percentage points, Trump increased his vote by more than 18%."

Final result: Biden/Clinton = 604,175/584,025 = 1.035 - 3.5% higher
Trump 2020/Trump 2016 = 132,870/108,748 = 1.222 - 22.2% higher.

2016 margin: 475,277
2020 margin: 471,305

So the margin did shrink, Biden improved the Democratic vote by a few percentage points, and Trump increased his vote by more than 18%. They said "while the final votes are still being counted", and "as of Saturday evening" for the numbers in the box.

I just noticed they did get one thing wrong - which was about 2012. They talked off "the third straight presidential race in which the Democratic margin out of Philadelphia has shrunk", but the margin in 2012 was higher than in 2008 - so it was only the "second straight" race in which the margin shrunk (which doesn't seem worth noting). But that was data they'd had for 8 years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California primary's less...»Reply #5