Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Aroundabout23

(69 posts)

14. I didn't say that you said that.

Reply to hack89 (Reply #13)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:56 PM

Jun 2022

I asked if that's what you think they are as they are pretty uset about this ruling. Are they stupid? Hysterical? What are they for questioning this ruling? What is your view of them to come out so strongly against the ruling? Asking a state to just pass a law (which could open those states up to all sorts of other issues) because the court decided to not respect jurisprudence doesn't seem simple or good especially considering the ground that this covers and our current (albeit long history) situation with mass shootings.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Hogg: This "is a reversal of 200+ years of jurisprudence that will get Americans killed. [View all] highplainsdem Jun 2022 OP

"...jurisprudence..." is not a legal concept for Clarence. dchill Jun 2022 #1

It's a slippery slope in reverse as technology results in fancier and deadlier firearms elias7 Jun 2022 #2

The line was drawn in 1934 hack89 Jun 2022 #4

So, if it's not ordnance or explosive, ANYTHING is fair game? Wednesdays Jun 2022 #5

No - the 1934 National Firearms Act drew the line as to what is a legal firearm hack89 Jun 2022 #6

A slight over reaction hack89 Jun 2022 #3

Yeah I am sure the DOJ is just overreacting.... Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #8

This ruling only applies to 9 states hack89 Jun 2022 #9

I see. It's not impossible so it is ok. Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #11

They are all solid blue states so legislation should in fact be easy peasy. hack89 Jun 2022 #13

I didn't say that you said that. Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #14

They are practical people that understand the need to reassure their supporters. hack89 Jun 2022 #17

His statement that it should deeply trouble us all is reassuring? Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #20

This ruling applies to 9 states hack89 Jun 2022 #24

so only roughly 1/5 of the states? Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #25

This issue can be resolve in a couple of months hack89 Jun 2022 #26

Can they? Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #27

NY has the strictest gun control laws in America hack89 Jun 2022 #28

Who is saying they will? Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #30

This simply means NY can't deny permits on based on whims and moods ripcord Jun 2022 #10

How are you asserting that it was whims and moods? Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #12

Exactly. hack89 Jun 2022 #15

I cannot agree to anything like that because I don't know if that is true. Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #16

Perhaps it is now time to actually read the ruling hack89 Jun 2022 #19

I read the ruling Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #21

There is plenty of structure to the process ripcord Jun 2022 #22

How do you know they would be? Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #23

You didn't read the decision did you? ripcord Jun 2022 #29

I did read it. Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #31

According to the SCOTUS carrying a concealed weapon for self defense is a right ripcord Jun 2022 #32

It cannot be a right because you have to have a permit. Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #33

They Don't Care Deep State Witch Jun 2022 #7

SCOTUS, apparently, is entitled to their own facts In It to Win It Jun 2022 #18