Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BlueCheeseAgain

(1,983 posts)

34. I'm surprised and disappointed in what Elie Mystal wrote.

Reply to irisblue (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 04:44 PM

Jun 2022

This emphatically does NOT overturn the right to remain silent. That's protected by the Fifth Amendment.

Not only that, if you're not read your rights, any evidence that is gained afterwards is still inadmissible. The Miranda warnings are still required.

The ruling does say that you can no longer sue the police afterwards for it, which is disappointing. But it does not overturn any other rights of the accused.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Miranda Rights--Cops NO LONGER HAVE TO TELL YOU ABOUT THEM [View all] irisblue Jun 2022 OP

Fuck Alito BTW irisblue Jun 2022 #1

I think it's ellie Jun 2022 #2

NEVER TALK TO A COP! Lochloosa Jun 2022 #3

OP that, it is crazy vital at this point Celerity Jun 2022 #8

Done. Lochloosa Jun 2022 #20

+1.... Shut the fuck up. Hotler Jun 2022 #22

Been trending in that direction for awhile. malthaussen Jun 2022 #4

What Elie Mystal said is true.... FM123 Jun 2022 #5

Don't talk to police. roamer65 Jun 2022 #6

You ask for an attorney RIGHT UP FRONT MOMFUDSKI Jun 2022 #30

Yup and demand they read the Miranda rights. roamer65 Jun 2022 #31

SC is going full shark now. ananda Jun 2022 #7

More important question: does UN-Mirandized evidence get excluded from a trial? Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #9

i think this ruling does change it. Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #13

This Was My Thought RobinA Jun 2022 #24

Yes, un-Mirandized evidence still gets excluded. BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2022 #33

Which is it? dumbcat Jun 2022 #10

That isn't what was held. PTWB Jun 2022 #11

Thank you. obnoxiousdrunk Jun 2022 #12

But the problem is that there will be no penalty to not reading them Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #14

No, that isn't how that works. PTWB Jun 2022 #16

True but doesn't a mistrial have to be ruled by the judge? Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #18

No, that isn't how that works. PTWB Jun 2022 #19

That all might be true Aroundabout23 Jun 2022 #25

The same reason they still must be read today... PTWB Jun 2022 #26

Bad ruling, but it's not more than it is. Cops will still get in trouble Hortensis Jun 2022 #21

There will absolutely be a penalty for not reading the Miranda warning. Jedi Guy Jun 2022 #27

The mis-information on this and the 2A ruling is appalling here, MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2022 #17

Yeah, these threads are always good for a laugh. Jedi Guy Jun 2022 #28

And that's exactly why I'm not even engaging MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2022 #29

That's how I understand it as well greenjar_01 Jun 2022 #23

And so, the curtain of fascism descends further upon us Cyrano Jun 2022 #15

No remedy no protection Drb2072 Jun 2022 #32

I'm surprised and disappointed in what Elie Mystal wrote. BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2022 #34