Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(15,150 posts)
9. Prior to Roe v Wade the supremes decided Griswold v Connecticut
Sat Jun 25, 2022, 10:30 AM
Jun 2022

Prior to Griswold in 1965, some states outlawed contraception. Griswold ruled that's none of the state's business. Roe was based, at least partially, on the Griswold decision.

Here's a brief synopsis of Griswold v Connecticut

In particular, Griswold v. Connecticut lays a foundation for the concept of a right to keep issues related to our bodies private. In the United States during the early twentieth century, it was illegal in many parts of the country to provide married couples with contraceptive devices, like the birth control pill, or to give advice about pregnancy and family planning.

Estelle Griswold, director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, and Dr. Buxton, a physician and the medical director of the New Haven, CT location, were both found guilty of violating two Connecticut laws. These laws criminalize use of contraception for anyone, including married couples, as well as providing any counseling on the subject. Griswold and Buxton counseled married patients about family planning and contraception. This case asks if the Constitution protects a married couple's right to learn about and use contraception for the purpose of preventing pregnancy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have some stupid questi...»Reply #9