General Discussion

In It to Win It

(12,209 posts)

5. Obama, Obama, Obama! We only had 60 senators for a small amount of time

Sat Jun 25, 2022, 11:33 AM

Jun 2022

Who were not entirely pro-choice!

YOU TRY PASSING A PRO-CHOICE BILL THROUGH 60 SENATORS WHO WERE NOT ALL PRO-CHOICE!!!!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Third party morons blame President Obama, RBG, and "Democratic normies", [View all] lapucelle Jun 2022 OP

Briahna Joy Gray really thinks the president can single-handedly codify something? TwilightZone Jun 2022 #1

Sen. Warren and Smith believe he can MichMan Jun 2022 #2

Maybe the 2 senators should be lobbying their fellows mcar Jun 2022 #4

+1 betsuni Jun 2022 #9

+1 sheshe2 Jun 2022 #44

This. nt PunkinPi Jun 2022 #94

Biden can't unilaterally declare a public health emergency. TwilightZone Jun 2022 #6

Maybe Warren and Smith didn't have time to follow President Biden's remarks yesterday. lapucelle Jun 2022 #10

They should have gotten elected President and done it. treestar Jun 2022 #53

I bet she and sirota voted for trump twice nt maryellen99 Jun 2022 #7

Gray, Turner, and the usual cast went out of there way not only to loudly proclaim they would not JohnSJ Jun 2022 #78

Covering their behinds mcar Jun 2022 #3

Obama, Obama, Obama! We only had 60 senators for a small amount of time In It to Win It Jun 2022 #5

"YOU TRY PASSING A PRO-CHOICE BILL THROUGH 60 SENATORS WHO WERE NOT ALL PRO-CHOICE!!!!!!" BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #29

YES! I mentioned him this morning talking about this. Also Ian Millhiser invites people In It to Win It Jun 2022 #30

One of my Senators at the time in 2009 - Arlen Specter (R) switched parties to (D) BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #60

According to the legal "experts" Roe was settled law. Obama was busy trying to save us from crisis Samrob Jun 2022 #38

+1 sheshe2 Jun 2022 #45

+2 treestar Jun 2022 #55

and the amount of things they expected in that time treestar Jun 2022 #54

It was a very brief window, and that some continue to not realize that only displays their JohnSJ Jun 2022 #79

... mcar Jun 2022 #8

OMG THAT CHART in the tweet is a KEEPER!!!! BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #21

Isn't it? mcar Jun 2022 #22

I love this chart LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #50

Sad thing is, it's 100% true mcar Jun 2022 #51

You are correct LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #93

That graphic In It to Win It Jun 2022 #27

Same here, crazy how it always comes down to Dem bashing n/t Shanti Shanti Shanti Jun 2022 #91

Rts TY, mcar! So True.. magats get Cha Jun 2022 #39

Perfect, thank you mcar! sheshe2 Jun 2022 #46

perfect summation! treestar Jun 2022 #57

That chart is brilliant TwilightZone Jun 2022 #59

Brilliant Me. Jun 2022 #70

Just read a long discussion, too many people convinced there are easy solutions laying around betsuni Jun 2022 #87

"Do something!!11" social media mcar Jun 2022 #88

Sad to say, but for a lot of people... Jedi Guy Jun 2022 #89

Three or four posts last night doing the same thing here AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2022 #11

How would anyone know that? N/T lapucelle Jun 2022 #31

Post removed Post removed Jun 2022 #33

Ratfucking scumbags dalton99a Jun 2022 #12

David Sirota is a Democrat AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #13

David Sirota is an independent. TwilightZone Jun 2022 #16

I'm interested in H2O Man Jun 2022 #32

The fact that Sirota is not a Democrat is right on his wiki page along with a professional headshot. lapucelle Jun 2022 #35

Wiki is not a reputable source lol AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #41

Yes it is. Sirota provided the headshot, and he is publicity conscious enough lapucelle Jun 2022 #47

lol no it is not. Anyone can edit it. AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #64

Where has he ever posted on twitter that he is a Democrat? lapucelle Jun 2022 #71

I have to agree H2O Man Jun 2022 #61

Yup exactly AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #65

Nope, he's a Dem AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #40

Prove it. TwilightZone Jun 2022 #49

Prove he's not AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #67

Really? lapucelle Jun 2022 #63

Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source & can be edited by anyone AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #68

Yet you have no evidence for the claim that an independent, third party advocate, anti-duopolist lapucelle Jun 2022 #76

He sure likes to attack Democrats dalton99a Jun 2022 #17

He hates Democrats and constantly bashes them mcar Jun 2022 #24

If he hates Democrats then why would he ever marry one who's serving in office? AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #69

Don't know mcar Jun 2022 #72

Because he's a fucking grifter first and foremost. W_HAMILTON Jun 2022 #81

Really? Well, Sirota certainly was busy depressing the Democratic vote on November 7, 2016. lapucelle Jun 2022 #25

+1. He ran a years-long smear campaign against Hillary dalton99a Jun 2022 #34

Whatever his wife is, he himself is a Dem-hater. BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2022 #26

There's no way to sugarcoat it - Ginsburg made a VERY risky gamble - gambling that the Democratic Midwestern Democrat Jun 2022 #14

When obvious statements are anathema Sympthsical Jun 2022 #18

Indeed. Unfortunately there are influencers who don't understand the obvious, lapucelle Jun 2022 #20

It's not on my radar Sympthsical Jun 2022 #23

It is a shame that folks like Yang and Gray cannot countenance the discussion of their past mistakes lapucelle Jun 2022 #28

No kidding. I'm no Bernie/"Our Revolution" fan, but I'm not ever going to engage in such blind hero Midwestern Democrat Jun 2022 #37

Agreed. The blind hero worship of third party acolytes who work to depress the Democratic vote lapucelle Jun 2022 #56

It wasn't RBG who made the risky gamble, lapucelle Jun 2022 #19

Matthew Iglesias said it good! Hortensis Jun 2022 #15

Those morons are ignorant of reality. LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #36

Agree! Why cover up their names? Cha Jun 2022 #43

FO to All those 3rd Party POS Who Cha Jun 2022 #42

Recommend! sheshe2 Jun 2022 #48

I hate that sentiment of Andrew Yang treestar Jun 2022 #52

Anyone wondering if we have them here too, heres a thread full of em. Lancero Jun 2022 #58

We wouldn't be here if RBG had retired in a timely fashion. Crunchy Frog Jun 2022 #62

Yes we would. Both the NY gun law case and Dobbs were 6-3 decisions. N/T lapucelle Jun 2022 #75

Dobbs yes, but not the complete overturning of Roe. Crunchy Frog Jun 2022 #77

Roberts proposal would had only delayed matters LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #82

Then why not blame Justice Kennedy who "unexpectedly retired" lapucelle Jun 2022 #85

If RBG retired before the 2014 midterms, the 60 vote filibuster was in effect LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #80

Fuck grifting Yang, and all the idiots who believe this shit. we can do it Jun 2022 #66

And Don't Forget PJB Me. Jun 2022 #73

They can say that crap all they want to. We have the receipts Samrob Jun 2022 #74

Just an aside ... Pete Ross Junior Jun 2022 #83

Well... Jedi Guy Jun 2022 #90

I am not a fan of the Justice Democrats LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #84

Rts💕TY & JDW, LMPV! Cha Jun 2022 #86

+1000, though after 2016 I no longer laugh at radical fringe Hortensis Jun 2022 #92