Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(164,847 posts)
29. "YOU TRY PASSING A PRO-CHOICE BILL THROUGH 60 SENATORS WHO WERE NOT ALL PRO-CHOICE!!!!!!"
Sat Jun 25, 2022, 12:52 PM
Jun 2022

The ACA was almost LOST in the House thanks to anti-women (D)s like Bart Stupak.

I posted this last month - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16661638

=========================================

I remember back in 2010, there were at least 12 of them who along with Bart Stupak (remember him?) refused to vote for the ACA unless abortion access had some kind of restriction, which initially meant that the "Hyde Amendment" wasn't enough. There were actually 64 Democrats who voted for Stupak's "Amendment".

Could Issue of Abortion Derail Health Care Bill?

Rep. Stupak says he won't vote for bill if it contains Senate abortion language.

By HUMA KHAN
March 4, 2010, 6:40 AM


WASHINGTON, March 4, 2010— -- Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., today said he and 11 other House members will not vote for the health care bill unless it includes more stringent language to prevent federal funding from going toward abortion services. "We're not going to vote for this bill with that kind of language," Stupak told "Good Morning America's" George Stephanopoulos today, referring to the Senate health care bill, which includes less restrictive language than what the Democratic lawmaker proposed in the House.

Stupak said he is willing to take the criticism that will be hurled at him if he blocks the bill because of the abortion language, but that he won't back down on his principles. "I want to see health care pass. I agree... people are being priced out of the market. We must have health care but, boy, there are some principles and beliefs that some of us are not going to pass," he said. "We're prepared to take the responsibility. I mean, I've been catching it ever since last fall. Let's face it, I want to see health care. But we're not going to bypass some principles and beliefs that we feel strongly about."

The ongoing abortion debate threatens to stall the health care bill and reflects the deep divide among Democrats. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs today said the president would like to see the House pass the health care bill before he departs for his international trip on March 18, but that does include passing the "fixes" that the White House has proposed.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., today said that the bill makes no changes to the existing law on abortion.

"There is no change in the access to abortion, no more no less. It is abortion neutral," Pelosi told reporters. "If you believe that there should be no federal funding for abortion, and if you believe that there should be no change in policy... we will pass the bill." Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius told Stephanopoulos on "GMA" that the bill is not about abortion, but about changing the health care system to ease the burden on families and small businesses facing skyrocketing insurance premiums.

https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/HealthCare/abortion-issue-derail-obama-democrats-health-care-efforts/story?id=10006591


Bart Stupak, A Year After Health Care: Getting 'Bitched Out' in Airports, How the Deal Went Down, and More

By Chris Good
March 23, 2011

Former congressman Bart Stupak was the lynchpin of health reform's passage, and he paid a price for it in the end.
The pro-life, Michigan Democrat led a small but powerful bloc of Democratic lawmakers to oppose the bill because of its language on federal funding of abortions. Seemingly at the last minute, Stupak and the White House hammered out a compromise, his pro-life allies supported the bill, and it passed by a thin margin.

After that, Stupak received a death threat. Facing outside spending in his district and a vitriolic political climate, he decided not to run for reelection. Now, he's a visiting fellow at Harvard's Institute of Politics.

On health care reform's first birthday, Stupak told The Atlantic about getting "bitch[ed] out" by angry citizens in airports, how he and President Obama reached the deal that secured the bill's passage, and that Rahm Emanuel knows better than to get in his face.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/03/bart-stupak-a-year-after-health-care-getting-bitched-out-in-airports-how-the-deal-went-down-and-more/72938/


Per this, there were 6 others with him at the time of his announcement of finally agreeing to it (of that group, there is still one still in Congress - Marcy Kaptur) - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stupak-to-vote-yes-on-health-care-bill/

Stupak was joined at the press conference by six other lawmakers, including Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), who had said previously she would vote yes, and Kathy Dahlkemper (D-PA), Nick Rahall (D-WV), Alan Mollohan (D-WV), Steve Driehaus (D-OH), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), who all said they would now be yes votes.


After he left congress, he was a huge supporter of Hobby Lobby (and their case).

There are still some in there and I hate to say. Below were some remaining post-ACA after trying to torpedo the ACA to forbid abortion services (bolded are still sitting members of Congress) -

Colin Peterson MN-07
Jim Cooper TN-05
Dan Lipinski IL-03
Stephen Lynch MA-08
Sanford Bishop GA-02
Jim Costa CA-16
Henry Cuellar TX-28
Jim Langevin RI-02
Tim Ryan OH-13
Richard Neal MA-01
Marcy Kaptur OH-09
Mike Doyle PA-14


(we know Tim Ryan just won the primary to run for Senate in OH)

And the one about to get a laser focus includes my own Senator, whose father was the defendant (as Governor) in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Granted, Bob Casey, Jr. is definitely NOT his father and has been much more moderate on the issue. But I know some of the local (and probably national) media have started to bubble about it...

If Roe v. Wade falls, Pennsylvania’s pro-life Sen. Bob Casey becomes a linchpin for abortion rights

He was one of two Dems who didn’t join 48 other senators in co-sponsoring the Women’s Health Protection Act.


Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in December 2021 Carolyn Kaster / AP Photo

Lizzy McLellan Ravitch
May. 03, 2022, 1:15 p.m.


Bob Casey is an outlier among his Democratic colleagues in the U.S. Senate. As a pro-life Democrat, he wants to limit the number of abortions that take place in the U.S. — but he also doesn’t approve of Republicans’ recent attempts to weaponize the issue. A draft of a U.S. Supreme Court decision leaked Monday night, indicating a likelihood that the justices will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Casey responded to the leaked opinion in a statement Tuesday afternoon.

“If this draft opinion becomes the final opinion of the Court, I have serious concerns about what overturning almost 50 years of legal precedent will mean for women in states passing near or total bans on abortion,” Casey said. “Congress should be working to reduce the number of abortions and unintended pregnancies and doing much more to support women and families.”

After the SCOTUS draft leaked, pro-choice advocates renewed calls for federal lawmakers to pass a law that would preserve abortion rights. The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Women’s Health Protection Act last fall. The Senate then voted in late February, but the act failed to get majority support.

Just two of the 50 sitting Democratic senators held back from co-sponsoring the bill. One was West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who ultimately joined Republicans (as he has on other issues) and voted against moving the act forward. The other holdout who declined to sponsor the bill was Casey, who has throughout his political career described himself as a pro-life Democrat. His father, former Pa. Gov. Bob Casey Sr., was famously pro-life.

https://billypenn.com/2022/05/03/bob-casey-abortion-senate-pro-life-democrat-scotus/


The entire thing above is just to make people aware because some of these people ARE getting pounded by some of their constituents now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Briahna Joy Gray really thinks the president can single-handedly codify something? TwilightZone Jun 2022 #1
Sen. Warren and Smith believe he can MichMan Jun 2022 #2
Maybe the 2 senators should be lobbying their fellows mcar Jun 2022 #4
+1 betsuni Jun 2022 #9
+1 sheshe2 Jun 2022 #44
This. nt PunkinPi Jun 2022 #94
Biden can't unilaterally declare a public health emergency. TwilightZone Jun 2022 #6
Maybe Warren and Smith didn't have time to follow President Biden's remarks yesterday. lapucelle Jun 2022 #10
They should have gotten elected President and done it. treestar Jun 2022 #53
I bet she and sirota voted for trump twice nt maryellen99 Jun 2022 #7
Gray, Turner, and the usual cast went out of there way not only to loudly proclaim they would not JohnSJ Jun 2022 #78
Covering their behinds mcar Jun 2022 #3
Obama, Obama, Obama! We only had 60 senators for a small amount of time In It to Win It Jun 2022 #5
"YOU TRY PASSING A PRO-CHOICE BILL THROUGH 60 SENATORS WHO WERE NOT ALL PRO-CHOICE!!!!!!" BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #29
YES! I mentioned him this morning talking about this. Also Ian Millhiser invites people In It to Win It Jun 2022 #30
One of my Senators at the time in 2009 - Arlen Specter (R) switched parties to (D) BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #60
According to the legal "experts" Roe was settled law. Obama was busy trying to save us from crisis Samrob Jun 2022 #38
+1 sheshe2 Jun 2022 #45
+2 treestar Jun 2022 #55
and the amount of things they expected in that time treestar Jun 2022 #54
It was a very brief window, and that some continue to not realize that only displays their JohnSJ Jun 2022 #79
... mcar Jun 2022 #8
OMG THAT CHART in the tweet is a KEEPER!!!! BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #21
Isn't it? mcar Jun 2022 #22
I love this chart LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #50
Sad thing is, it's 100% true mcar Jun 2022 #51
You are correct LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #93
That graphic In It to Win It Jun 2022 #27
Same here, crazy how it always comes down to Dem bashing n/t Shanti Shanti Shanti Jun 2022 #91
Rts TY, mcar! So True.. magats get Cha Jun 2022 #39
Perfect, thank you mcar! sheshe2 Jun 2022 #46
perfect summation! treestar Jun 2022 #57
That chart is brilliant TwilightZone Jun 2022 #59
Brilliant Me. Jun 2022 #70
Just read a long discussion, too many people convinced there are easy solutions laying around betsuni Jun 2022 #87
"Do something!!11" social media mcar Jun 2022 #88
Sad to say, but for a lot of people... Jedi Guy Jun 2022 #89
Three or four posts last night doing the same thing here AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2022 #11
How would anyone know that? N/T lapucelle Jun 2022 #31
Post removed Post removed Jun 2022 #33
Ratfucking scumbags dalton99a Jun 2022 #12
David Sirota is a Democrat AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #13
David Sirota is an independent. TwilightZone Jun 2022 #16
I'm interested in H2O Man Jun 2022 #32
The fact that Sirota is not a Democrat is right on his wiki page along with a professional headshot. lapucelle Jun 2022 #35
Wiki is not a reputable source lol AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #41
Yes it is. Sirota provided the headshot, and he is publicity conscious enough lapucelle Jun 2022 #47
lol no it is not. Anyone can edit it. AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #64
Where has he ever posted on twitter that he is a Democrat? lapucelle Jun 2022 #71
I have to agree H2O Man Jun 2022 #61
Yup exactly AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #65
Nope, he's a Dem AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #40
Prove it. TwilightZone Jun 2022 #49
Prove he's not AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #67
Really? lapucelle Jun 2022 #63
Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source & can be edited by anyone AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #68
Yet you have no evidence for the claim that an independent, third party advocate, anti-duopolist lapucelle Jun 2022 #76
He sure likes to attack Democrats dalton99a Jun 2022 #17
He hates Democrats and constantly bashes them mcar Jun 2022 #24
If he hates Democrats then why would he ever marry one who's serving in office? AntivaxHunters Jun 2022 #69
Don't know mcar Jun 2022 #72
Because he's a fucking grifter first and foremost. W_HAMILTON Jun 2022 #81
Really? Well, Sirota certainly was busy depressing the Democratic vote on November 7, 2016. lapucelle Jun 2022 #25
+1. He ran a years-long smear campaign against Hillary dalton99a Jun 2022 #34
Whatever his wife is, he himself is a Dem-hater. BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2022 #26
There's no way to sugarcoat it - Ginsburg made a VERY risky gamble - gambling that the Democratic Midwestern Democrat Jun 2022 #14
When obvious statements are anathema Sympthsical Jun 2022 #18
Indeed. Unfortunately there are influencers who don't understand the obvious, lapucelle Jun 2022 #20
It's not on my radar Sympthsical Jun 2022 #23
It is a shame that folks like Yang and Gray cannot countenance the discussion of their past mistakes lapucelle Jun 2022 #28
No kidding. I'm no Bernie/"Our Revolution" fan, but I'm not ever going to engage in such blind hero Midwestern Democrat Jun 2022 #37
Agreed. The blind hero worship of third party acolytes who work to depress the Democratic vote lapucelle Jun 2022 #56
It wasn't RBG who made the risky gamble, lapucelle Jun 2022 #19
Matthew Iglesias said it good! Hortensis Jun 2022 #15
Those morons are ignorant of reality. LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #36
Agree! Why cover up their names? Cha Jun 2022 #43
FO to All those 3rd Party POS Who Cha Jun 2022 #42
Recommend! sheshe2 Jun 2022 #48
I hate that sentiment of Andrew Yang treestar Jun 2022 #52
Anyone wondering if we have them here too, heres a thread full of em. Lancero Jun 2022 #58
We wouldn't be here if RBG had retired in a timely fashion. Crunchy Frog Jun 2022 #62
Yes we would. Both the NY gun law case and Dobbs were 6-3 decisions. N/T lapucelle Jun 2022 #75
Dobbs yes, but not the complete overturning of Roe. Crunchy Frog Jun 2022 #77
Roberts proposal would had only delayed matters LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #82
Then why not blame Justice Kennedy who "unexpectedly retired" lapucelle Jun 2022 #85
If RBG retired before the 2014 midterms, the 60 vote filibuster was in effect LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #80
Fuck grifting Yang, and all the idiots who believe this shit. we can do it Jun 2022 #66
And Don't Forget PJB Me. Jun 2022 #73
They can say that crap all they want to. We have the receipts Samrob Jun 2022 #74
Just an aside ... Pete Ross Junior Jun 2022 #83
Well... Jedi Guy Jun 2022 #90
I am not a fan of the Justice Democrats LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2022 #84
Rts💕TY & JDW, LMPV! Cha Jun 2022 #86
+1000, though after 2016 I no longer laugh at radical fringe Hortensis Jun 2022 #92
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Third party morons blame ...»Reply #29