Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Third party morons blame President Obama, RBG, and "Democratic normies", [View all]BumRushDaShow
(164,847 posts)29. "YOU TRY PASSING A PRO-CHOICE BILL THROUGH 60 SENATORS WHO WERE NOT ALL PRO-CHOICE!!!!!!"
The ACA was almost LOST in the House thanks to anti-women (D)s like Bart Stupak.
I posted this last month - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16661638
=========================================
I remember back in 2010, there were at least 12 of them who along with Bart Stupak (remember him?) refused to vote for the ACA unless abortion access had some kind of restriction, which initially meant that the "Hyde Amendment" wasn't enough. There were actually 64 Democrats who voted for Stupak's "Amendment".
Could Issue of Abortion Derail Health Care Bill?
Rep. Stupak says he won't vote for bill if it contains Senate abortion language.
By HUMA KHAN
March 4, 2010, 6:40 AM
WASHINGTON, March 4, 2010 -- Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., today said he and 11 other House members will not vote for the health care bill unless it includes more stringent language to prevent federal funding from going toward abortion services. "We're not going to vote for this bill with that kind of language," Stupak told "Good Morning America's" George Stephanopoulos today, referring to the Senate health care bill, which includes less restrictive language than what the Democratic lawmaker proposed in the House.
Stupak said he is willing to take the criticism that will be hurled at him if he blocks the bill because of the abortion language, but that he won't back down on his principles. "I want to see health care pass. I agree... people are being priced out of the market. We must have health care but, boy, there are some principles and beliefs that some of us are not going to pass," he said. "We're prepared to take the responsibility. I mean, I've been catching it ever since last fall. Let's face it, I want to see health care. But we're not going to bypass some principles and beliefs that we feel strongly about."
The ongoing abortion debate threatens to stall the health care bill and reflects the deep divide among Democrats. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs today said the president would like to see the House pass the health care bill before he departs for his international trip on March 18, but that does include passing the "fixes" that the White House has proposed.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., today said that the bill makes no changes to the existing law on abortion.
"There is no change in the access to abortion, no more no less. It is abortion neutral," Pelosi told reporters. "If you believe that there should be no federal funding for abortion, and if you believe that there should be no change in policy... we will pass the bill." Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius told Stephanopoulos on "GMA" that the bill is not about abortion, but about changing the health care system to ease the burden on families and small businesses facing skyrocketing insurance premiums.
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/HealthCare/abortion-issue-derail-obama-democrats-health-care-efforts/story?id=10006591
Rep. Stupak says he won't vote for bill if it contains Senate abortion language.
By HUMA KHAN
March 4, 2010, 6:40 AM
WASHINGTON, March 4, 2010 -- Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., today said he and 11 other House members will not vote for the health care bill unless it includes more stringent language to prevent federal funding from going toward abortion services. "We're not going to vote for this bill with that kind of language," Stupak told "Good Morning America's" George Stephanopoulos today, referring to the Senate health care bill, which includes less restrictive language than what the Democratic lawmaker proposed in the House.
Stupak said he is willing to take the criticism that will be hurled at him if he blocks the bill because of the abortion language, but that he won't back down on his principles. "I want to see health care pass. I agree... people are being priced out of the market. We must have health care but, boy, there are some principles and beliefs that some of us are not going to pass," he said. "We're prepared to take the responsibility. I mean, I've been catching it ever since last fall. Let's face it, I want to see health care. But we're not going to bypass some principles and beliefs that we feel strongly about."
The ongoing abortion debate threatens to stall the health care bill and reflects the deep divide among Democrats. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs today said the president would like to see the House pass the health care bill before he departs for his international trip on March 18, but that does include passing the "fixes" that the White House has proposed.House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., today said that the bill makes no changes to the existing law on abortion.
"There is no change in the access to abortion, no more no less. It is abortion neutral," Pelosi told reporters. "If you believe that there should be no federal funding for abortion, and if you believe that there should be no change in policy... we will pass the bill." Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius told Stephanopoulos on "GMA" that the bill is not about abortion, but about changing the health care system to ease the burden on families and small businesses facing skyrocketing insurance premiums.
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/HealthCare/abortion-issue-derail-obama-democrats-health-care-efforts/story?id=10006591
Bart Stupak, A Year After Health Care: Getting 'Bitched Out' in Airports, How the Deal Went Down, and More
By Chris Good
March 23, 2011
Former congressman Bart Stupak was the lynchpin of health reform's passage, and he paid a price for it in the end.
The pro-life, Michigan Democrat led a small but powerful bloc of Democratic lawmakers to oppose the bill because of its language on federal funding of abortions. Seemingly at the last minute, Stupak and the White House hammered out a compromise, his pro-life allies supported the bill, and it passed by a thin margin.
After that, Stupak received a death threat. Facing outside spending in his district and a vitriolic political climate, he decided not to run for reelection. Now, he's a visiting fellow at Harvard's Institute of Politics.
On health care reform's first birthday, Stupak told The Atlantic about getting "bitch[ed] out" by angry citizens in airports, how he and President Obama reached the deal that secured the bill's passage, and that Rahm Emanuel knows better than to get in his face.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/03/bart-stupak-a-year-after-health-care-getting-bitched-out-in-airports-how-the-deal-went-down-and-more/72938/
By Chris Good
March 23, 2011
Former congressman Bart Stupak was the lynchpin of health reform's passage, and he paid a price for it in the end.
The pro-life, Michigan Democrat led a small but powerful bloc of Democratic lawmakers to oppose the bill because of its language on federal funding of abortions. Seemingly at the last minute, Stupak and the White House hammered out a compromise, his pro-life allies supported the bill, and it passed by a thin margin.
After that, Stupak received a death threat. Facing outside spending in his district and a vitriolic political climate, he decided not to run for reelection. Now, he's a visiting fellow at Harvard's Institute of Politics.
On health care reform's first birthday, Stupak told The Atlantic about getting "bitch[ed] out" by angry citizens in airports, how he and President Obama reached the deal that secured the bill's passage, and that Rahm Emanuel knows better than to get in his face.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/03/bart-stupak-a-year-after-health-care-getting-bitched-out-in-airports-how-the-deal-went-down-and-more/72938/
Per this, there were 6 others with him at the time of his announcement of finally agreeing to it (of that group, there is still one still in Congress - Marcy Kaptur) - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/stupak-to-vote-yes-on-health-care-bill/
Stupak was joined at the press conference by six other lawmakers, including Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), who had said previously she would vote yes, and Kathy Dahlkemper (D-PA), Nick Rahall (D-WV), Alan Mollohan (D-WV), Steve Driehaus (D-OH), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), who all said they would now be yes votes.
After he left congress, he was a huge supporter of Hobby Lobby (and their case).
There are still some in there and I hate to say. Below were some remaining post-ACA after trying to torpedo the ACA to forbid abortion services (bolded are still sitting members of Congress) -
Colin Peterson MN-07
Jim Cooper TN-05
Dan Lipinski IL-03
Stephen Lynch MA-08
Sanford Bishop GA-02
Jim Costa CA-16
Henry Cuellar TX-28
Jim Langevin RI-02
Tim Ryan OH-13
Richard Neal MA-01
Marcy Kaptur OH-09
Mike Doyle PA-14
Jim Cooper TN-05
Dan Lipinski IL-03
Stephen Lynch MA-08
Sanford Bishop GA-02
Jim Costa CA-16
Henry Cuellar TX-28
Jim Langevin RI-02
Tim Ryan OH-13
Richard Neal MA-01
Marcy Kaptur OH-09
Mike Doyle PA-14
(we know Tim Ryan just won the primary to run for Senate in OH)
And the one about to get a laser focus includes my own Senator, whose father was the defendant (as Governor) in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Granted, Bob Casey, Jr. is definitely NOT his father and has been much more moderate on the issue. But I know some of the local (and probably national) media have started to bubble about it...
If Roe v. Wade falls, Pennsylvanias pro-life Sen. Bob Casey becomes a linchpin for abortion rights
He was one of two Dems who didnt join 48 other senators in co-sponsoring the Womens Health Protection Act.

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in December 2021 Carolyn Kaster / AP Photo
Lizzy McLellan Ravitch
May. 03, 2022, 1:15 p.m.
Bob Casey is an outlier among his Democratic colleagues in the U.S. Senate. As a pro-life Democrat, he wants to limit the number of abortions that take place in the U.S. but he also doesnt approve of Republicans recent attempts to weaponize the issue. A draft of a U.S. Supreme Court decision leaked Monday night, indicating a likelihood that the justices will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Casey responded to the leaked opinion in a statement Tuesday afternoon.
If this draft opinion becomes the final opinion of the Court, I have serious concerns about what overturning almost 50 years of legal precedent will mean for women in states passing near or total bans on abortion, Casey said. Congress should be working to reduce the number of abortions and unintended pregnancies and doing much more to support women and families.
After the SCOTUS draft leaked, pro-choice advocates renewed calls for federal lawmakers to pass a law that would preserve abortion rights. The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Womens Health Protection Act last fall. The Senate then voted in late February, but the act failed to get majority support.
Just two of the 50 sitting Democratic senators held back from co-sponsoring the bill. One was West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who ultimately joined Republicans (as he has on other issues) and voted against moving the act forward. The other holdout who declined to sponsor the bill was Casey, who has throughout his political career described himself as a pro-life Democrat. His father, former Pa. Gov. Bob Casey Sr., was famously pro-life.
https://billypenn.com/2022/05/03/bob-casey-abortion-senate-pro-life-democrat-scotus/
He was one of two Dems who didnt join 48 other senators in co-sponsoring the Womens Health Protection Act.

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in December 2021 Carolyn Kaster / AP Photo
Lizzy McLellan Ravitch
May. 03, 2022, 1:15 p.m.
Bob Casey is an outlier among his Democratic colleagues in the U.S. Senate. As a pro-life Democrat, he wants to limit the number of abortions that take place in the U.S. but he also doesnt approve of Republicans recent attempts to weaponize the issue. A draft of a U.S. Supreme Court decision leaked Monday night, indicating a likelihood that the justices will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade. Casey responded to the leaked opinion in a statement Tuesday afternoon.
If this draft opinion becomes the final opinion of the Court, I have serious concerns about what overturning almost 50 years of legal precedent will mean for women in states passing near or total bans on abortion, Casey said. Congress should be working to reduce the number of abortions and unintended pregnancies and doing much more to support women and families.
After the SCOTUS draft leaked, pro-choice advocates renewed calls for federal lawmakers to pass a law that would preserve abortion rights. The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Womens Health Protection Act last fall. The Senate then voted in late February, but the act failed to get majority support.
Just two of the 50 sitting Democratic senators held back from co-sponsoring the bill. One was West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, who ultimately joined Republicans (as he has on other issues) and voted against moving the act forward. The other holdout who declined to sponsor the bill was Casey, who has throughout his political career described himself as a pro-life Democrat. His father, former Pa. Gov. Bob Casey Sr., was famously pro-life.
https://billypenn.com/2022/05/03/bob-casey-abortion-senate-pro-life-democrat-scotus/
The entire thing above is just to make people aware because some of these people ARE getting pounded by some of their constituents now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Third party morons blame President Obama, RBG, and "Democratic normies", [View all]
lapucelle
Jun 2022
OP
Briahna Joy Gray really thinks the president can single-handedly codify something?
TwilightZone
Jun 2022
#1
Maybe Warren and Smith didn't have time to follow President Biden's remarks yesterday.
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#10
Gray, Turner, and the usual cast went out of there way not only to loudly proclaim they would not
JohnSJ
Jun 2022
#78
"YOU TRY PASSING A PRO-CHOICE BILL THROUGH 60 SENATORS WHO WERE NOT ALL PRO-CHOICE!!!!!!"
BumRushDaShow
Jun 2022
#29
YES! I mentioned him this morning talking about this. Also Ian Millhiser invites people
In It to Win It
Jun 2022
#30
One of my Senators at the time in 2009 - Arlen Specter (R) switched parties to (D)
BumRushDaShow
Jun 2022
#60
According to the legal "experts" Roe was settled law. Obama was busy trying to save us from crisis
Samrob
Jun 2022
#38
It was a very brief window, and that some continue to not realize that only displays their
JohnSJ
Jun 2022
#79
Just read a long discussion, too many people convinced there are easy solutions laying around
betsuni
Jun 2022
#87
The fact that Sirota is not a Democrat is right on his wiki page along with a professional headshot.
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#35
Yes it is. Sirota provided the headshot, and he is publicity conscious enough
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#47
Yet you have no evidence for the claim that an independent, third party advocate, anti-duopolist
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#76
If he hates Democrats then why would he ever marry one who's serving in office?
AntivaxHunters
Jun 2022
#69
Really? Well, Sirota certainly was busy depressing the Democratic vote on November 7, 2016.
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#25
There's no way to sugarcoat it - Ginsburg made a VERY risky gamble - gambling that the Democratic
Midwestern Democrat
Jun 2022
#14
Indeed. Unfortunately there are influencers who don't understand the obvious,
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#20
It is a shame that folks like Yang and Gray cannot countenance the discussion of their past mistakes
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#28
No kidding. I'm no Bernie/"Our Revolution" fan, but I'm not ever going to engage in such blind hero
Midwestern Democrat
Jun 2022
#37
Agreed. The blind hero worship of third party acolytes who work to depress the Democratic vote
lapucelle
Jun 2022
#56
If RBG retired before the 2014 midterms, the 60 vote filibuster was in effect
LetMyPeopleVote
Jun 2022
#80