General Discussion

SouthernLiberal

(408 posts)

55. I agree

Sat Jun 25, 2022, 03:28 PM

Jun 2022

I too am in an Interracial marriage. Still a newly wed. I am horrified by the willingness of our Supreme Court to undo our rights. I saw something recently pointing out that one of these newly discovered rights was decided in Brown v The Board of Education. That made public education integrated. It is not that much older than abortion rights. It was decided in the year I was born 68 years ago.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Samuel L. Jackson goes in on Clarence Thomas with a Supreme Court decision reminder that hits close [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2022 OP

No worries. The state racial classification board will make him a honorary Aryan dalton99a Jun 2022 #1

THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Jun 2022 #6

Lol. nt ecstatic Jun 2022 #9

Thank You....Kicked for all to read the explanation. Please read it, It's important! Stuart G Jun 2022 #2

There's too many m'fckin snakes on this m'fckin Supreme Court! nt Buns_of_Fire Jun 2022 #3

U DA BEST. and you WIN my day! n/t MFGsunny Jun 2022 #7

LOL! Thread winnah! Trailrider1951 Jun 2022 #10

"Uncle Clarence" milestogo Jun 2022 #4

Yeah, he went there. Mr. Evil Jun 2022 #24

Thomas is a fucking hypocrite. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #5

He's self-hating and hates his own race. LenaBaby61 Jun 2022 #11

There is 0 chance Thomas resigns or is impeached PTWB Jun 2022 #14

14. There is 0 chance Thomas resigns or is impeached. LenaBaby61 Jun 2022 #15

What evidence do you have to support your confidence? PTWB Jun 2022 #28

a unicorn came to them in a dream and told them so ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #52

IF it was possible and I do mean IF KS Toronado Jun 2022 #18

Im sure the other 5 would find a way to accomodate quakerboy Jun 2022 #35

Appointments to the Court are "on good behavior." malthaussen Jun 2022 #48

I replied ... Hugh_Lebowski Jun 2022 #8

K&R! dchill Jun 2022 #12

Samuel L is **ENTIRELY** too cool 😎 dixiechiken1 Jun 2022 #13

WELL OF COURSE YoshidaYui Jun 2022 #27

It's already being pushed... Pluvious Jun 2022 #16

Mais naturellement. malthaussen Jun 2022 #49

Get this motherfucking judge off my motherfucking Supreme Court! ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #17

hahahahaha JohnnyRingo Jun 2022 #44

job done. Enjoy the sunshine. ZonkerHarris Jun 2022 #51

Justice ThomASS would love to reverse Loving v Virginia...why? SayItLoud Jun 2022 #19

It just hit me! Of course, how could we be so blind? jaxexpat Jun 2022 #20

There is no chance of Thomas resigning.... until he does Tetrachloride Jun 2022 #21

I'll be impressed when celebrities refuse to work in states that don't protect reproductive rights. Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #22

Right after "you" decide to not work in a state that doesn't protect reproductive rights. Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #37

Fair enough- I live in Canada, used to live in California. Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #40

I'm in an interracial marriage LittleGirl Jun 2022 #23

I agree SouthernLiberal Jun 2022 #55

thomas probably lives in a blue state so I'm sure he will say fuck anyone else's rights mucifer Jun 2022 #25

WELL OF COURSE, HE IS A JEDI WITH A PURPLE light saber!!! YoshidaYui Jun 2022 #26

"Uncle Clarence." Now, that's a good burn. n/t malthaussen Jun 2022 #29

Should be BonnieJW Jun 2022 #42

Very good! n/t malthaussen Jun 2022 #45

If Thomas had married in the 50s what would had happened to him? LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #30

Well, if he and Ginni had gotten married in Virginia... Scottie Mom Jun 2022 #33

Clarence 's revenge scipan Jun 2022 #31

That makes no sense, Uncle Clarence. rubbersole Jun 2022 #34

How Did Liberals Make His Life Hell For 43 Years? erpowers Jun 2022 #39

Loving v. Virginia is based on privacy rights of the U.S. Const. Scottie Mom Jun 2022 #32

It would be interesting to hear a state's rationale for passing a new miscegenation law. sop Jun 2022 #38

Indeed. Hard to see how it could be done without being overtly racist. malthaussen Jun 2022 #47

I don't think that some states would have to pass new laws (thinking deep South red states). Scottie Mom Jun 2022 #50

SC justices, ie KINGS, would be given special dispensation, right? Ferrets are Cool Jun 2022 #36

Never thought of that. JohnnyRingo Jun 2022 #41

It fits Mblaze Jun 2022 #43

somebody made a good point treestar Jun 2022 #54

Clarence Thomas is an inhuman monster with no regard for any decency. Initech Jun 2022 #46

at least he'd dissent there treestar Jun 2022 #53

Rt💕🤷‍♂️TY & Sam jackson! Cha Jun 2022 #56