General Discussion

JI7

(93,656 posts)

6. Would not have worked before in many places. That's why it's important to have the court

Reply to Wounded Bear (Reply #2)

Sat Jun 25, 2022, 09:41 PM

Jun 2022

Even many people here just this year justify not voting democratic unless Biden gets rid of all student debt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Plouffe has the right idea! End the circular firing squad and concentrate on this! [View all] YorkRd Jun 2022 OP

K&R! liberalla Jun 2022 #1

Dems should have been openly pro-choice for 50 years...nt Wounded Bear Jun 2022 #2

Would not have worked before in many places. That's why it's important to have the court JI7 Jun 2022 #6

Yeah, cuz that Susan Sarandon bullshit worked out so well last time... dixiechiken1 Jun 2022 #10

Spread this far & wide, especially among young & new voters. CrispyQ Jun 2022 #49

Yes, I've read this before and really like it. Thanks for the reminder! liberalla Jun 2022 #65

This message was self-deleted by its author liberalla Jun 2022 #66

Most were save for a pile of anti-abortion Democrats who almost scuttled the ACA in 2010 BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #12

Thanks. But I'm still confused. Are you presenting a history of anti-abortion Democrats? ancianita Jun 2022 #54

Yes - the one I was replying to posted this-- BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #57

I saw that. And thanks for the updated list of "sitting." I'm just not familiar. ancianita Jun 2022 #58

There were some articles and statements put out BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #62

All but two are anti-abortion?! Good lord. ancianita Jun 2022 #63

Back in 2009/2010 when that Amendment was making the rounds BumRushDaShow Jun 2022 #64

Yes. Raven123 Jun 2022 #3

Have to get rid of the filibuster to do that, but it can be done. Meadowoak Jun 2022 #4

a gain of 2 seats neutralizes the allgedley democratic saboteurs in the senate nt msongs Jun 2022 #5

I would be personally gratified when Manchin once again yonder Jun 2022 #11

TY & David Plouffe!! Cha Jun 2022 #7

Question... will the SCOTUS then just saw the law is "unconstitutional?" budkin Jun 2022 #8

Not a question at all. malthaussen Jun 2022 #60

My state Senate District had it's annual picnic today dflprincess Jun 2022 #9

I think the message needs to be ten more Democratic Senators Tumbulu Jun 2022 #13

there are 8 winnable races on the board. we need a min of 4. mopinko Jun 2022 #14

Absolutely! Tumbulu Jun 2022 #59

Here are the seats Ananda62 Jun 2022 #68

Michael Bennet in Colorado has a lead in the polls, soldierant Jun 2022 #71

+1 nt TigressDem Jun 2022 #45

focus like a fucking laser.... bahboo Jun 2022 #15

i thought there had to be 60 senators to override the republican veto certainot Jun 2022 #16

As the rules currently exist AZSkiffyGeek Jun 2022 #23

ta nt certainot Jun 2022 #42

Pennsylvania will do its share - John Fetterman will flip our Senate seat to BLUE in November FakeNoose Jun 2022 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jun 2022 #18

Beware moving goalposts - remember Liebermann scuttled Obama's agenda; Dems had over 60 at that time Tommymac Jun 2022 #53

We need more than 2 new D Senators KS Toronado Jun 2022 #19

K. R. dchill Jun 2022 #20

I'm all for trying that SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2022 #21

Yeah, the Supremely Religious Court created that power out of whole cloth Farmer-Rick Jun 2022 #30

Someone has to SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2022 #33

Why? Farmer-Rick Jun 2022 #34

We'll have SickOfTheOnePct Jun 2022 #36

Judicial review is covered extensively in the Federalist Papers Sympthsical Jun 2022 #37

The Supremes declared the power for themselves Farmer-Rick Jun 2022 #39

This is a very simplistic understanding Sympthsical Jun 2022 #40

OR MAYBE.... if the SCOTUS has this type of power and is wont to abuse it, things need to change. TigressDem Jun 2022 #46

Not a bunch of unelected, job for life, royalist wanna be jurists. n/t MarcA Jun 2022 #52

How about making the argument under 9th amendment grounds? In It to Win It Jun 2022 #38

SCOTUS will / could then deem that new law unconstitutional. n/t TeamProg Jun 2022 #22

And they should be ignored. Farmer-Rick Jun 2022 #31

+1000 ancianita Jun 2022 #55

K&R. c-rational Jun 2022 #24

This has been true for decades. Democrats need a solid majority in both houses of Congress Martin68 Jun 2022 #25

Biden and all the Dems need to dribpve this message home before Nov. BigmanPigman Jun 2022 #26

K&R burrowowl Jun 2022 #27

on the road to Badass junction! 🎉 bringthePaine Jun 2022 #28

Post removed Post removed Jun 2022 #29

Twitter reply: Rhiannon12866 Jun 2022 #32

GOTV get er done. nt TigressDem Jun 2022 #47

Exactly. This the way Democrats storm the Capital. mjvpi Jun 2022 #67

OH! I LIKE THAT! TigressDem Jun 2022 #73

Absolutely spanone Jun 2022 #35

I'm really sick of seeing: Democrats are weak/spineless/don't fight; control the government betsuni Jun 2022 #41

Me too. Novara Jun 2022 #44

That's really the gist of it Novara Jun 2022 #43

Are we sure the other 48 senators would bypass the fillibuster to codify Roe? 867-5309. Jun 2022 #48

Start by donating money to these candidates on Omaha Steve's list DBoon Jun 2022 #50

So in IA, ancianita Jun 2022 #56

Also need to fight for Governor, Secretary of State and attorney general races Beaverhausen Jun 2022 #51

Be advised that this is only a first step, and it is important to remember that. malthaussen Jun 2022 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author WarGamer Jun 2022 #69

He's a smart guy. I enjoyed the book he wrote about being Obama's campaign manager. OMGWTF Jun 2022 #70

It isn't just Roe. SCOTUS is now demonstrably a clear and present danger. soldierant Jun 2022 #72