Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We should have raised holy hell about Garland. [View all]Solomon
(12,644 posts)40. Yep. The first black president could have done everything a white president could do.
Right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kirschner is not a constitutional expert. And he's mocked for mis-stating basic legal principles
onenote
Jun 2022
#15
President Obama potentially COULD have made a recess apointment of Garland on January 3, 2017
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#23
You are citing possible dicta from the Canning case as controlling on the length of the recess
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#46
No he couldn't. That would require a recess. And the Republicans controlled the Senate.
onenote
Jun 2022
#12
There was a indeed a recess on January 3, 2017 between the old and new Congress
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#24
President Obama didn't mention Garland once in his speech at the 2016 convention
BeyondGeography
Jun 2022
#9
Given we were under an electronic invasion by Russia, I don't think it would have
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#37
Yep. The first black president could have done everything a white president could do.
Solomon
Jun 2022
#40
This is absolute nonsense. There is nothing President Obama could have done differently that
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#18
You keep jumping between so many fringe legal fantasies here, it's hard to keep up.
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#47
I hadn't realized you shifted from "just pretend they're confirmed" to some recess appointment
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#50
I haven't "shifted" one bit. A recess appointment is consistently what I mentioned in my posts here
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#55
Garland's seat on the DC Circuit only would have been lost if he participated in a gimmicky
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#56
You can't hold a pro forma session between TWO different Congresses, can you?
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#33
A Democratic president would never do that, we're the "lets all try and get along party"
Mr. Sparkle
Jun 2022
#42
We did and we were informed not to threaten them with the courts...for Christ sake.
Demsrule86
Jun 2022
#52