Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We should have raised holy hell about Garland. [View all]FBaggins
(28,706 posts)45. No... it's frivolous
Note that this isnt an article that goes one way.
Its a SCOTUS ruling on the relevant question (and not one written by the conservatives)
Obama had not option of getting around the Senate. And if by some miracle he did
recess appointments are temporary. Absent a Clinton win, Gorsuch was headed to the court.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kirschner is not a constitutional expert. And he's mocked for mis-stating basic legal principles
onenote
Jun 2022
#15
President Obama potentially COULD have made a recess apointment of Garland on January 3, 2017
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#23
You are citing possible dicta from the Canning case as controlling on the length of the recess
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#46
No he couldn't. That would require a recess. And the Republicans controlled the Senate.
onenote
Jun 2022
#12
There was a indeed a recess on January 3, 2017 between the old and new Congress
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#24
President Obama didn't mention Garland once in his speech at the 2016 convention
BeyondGeography
Jun 2022
#9
Given we were under an electronic invasion by Russia, I don't think it would have
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#37
Yep. The first black president could have done everything a white president could do.
Solomon
Jun 2022
#40
This is absolute nonsense. There is nothing President Obama could have done differently that
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#18
You keep jumping between so many fringe legal fantasies here, it's hard to keep up.
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#47
I hadn't realized you shifted from "just pretend they're confirmed" to some recess appointment
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#50
I haven't "shifted" one bit. A recess appointment is consistently what I mentioned in my posts here
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#55
Garland's seat on the DC Circuit only would have been lost if he participated in a gimmicky
tritsofme
Jun 2022
#56
You can't hold a pro forma session between TWO different Congresses, can you?
MerryHolidays
Jun 2022
#33
A Democratic president would never do that, we're the "lets all try and get along party"
Mr. Sparkle
Jun 2022
#42
We did and we were informed not to threaten them with the courts...for Christ sake.
Demsrule86
Jun 2022
#52