Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,983 posts)

7. In those cases, they are charging the women for supposedly inducing the miscarriage.

Sun Jun 26, 2022, 07:08 PM

Jun 2022

In other words, because they caused an "abortion", not because they received one.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why don't anti-abortion laws ever punish the person who gets the abortion? [View all] BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2022 OP

that is already changing in some states AlexSFCA Jun 2022 #1

Sorry about getting you temporarily infuriated. BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2022 #9

Don't give them any ideas emulatorloo Jun 2022 #4

Sounds like a question from trump!!! texasfiddler Jun 2022 #5

IIRC, the piece of shit DID once admit in an interview Buns_of_Fire Jun 2022 #21

If they did do that, what do you think the reaction would be? BlueCheeseAgain Jun 2022 #8

IN, not IA jmowreader Jun 2022 #14

Whoops, unintended bad association with IA. To IN's credit, Hortensis Jun 2022 #20

And where do the fathers come into the equation? dutch777 Jun 2022 #13

It has only been 3 days since the decision MiniMe Jun 2022 #15

Give them time. It's coming. jmowreader Jun 2022 #16

Could be pure numbers FBaggins Jun 2022 #17

It is #2. David__77 Jun 2022 #18

Yes. Boomerproud Jun 2022 #23

I don't believe your premise to be accurate msfiddlestix Jun 2022 #22