Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)We're Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. We're Going Somewhere Worse [View all]
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
The New Yorker
@NewYorker
·
Follow
Today, more than half of all abortions in the U.S. are medication abortions. Ordering pills in states that prohibit abortions will be unlawful, leaving women in those states to have to choose between risking their freedom and risking their health.
newyorker.com
Were Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. Were Going Somewhere Worse
We are entering an era not just of unsafe abortions but of the widespread criminalization of pregnancy.
10:38 PM · Jun 27, 2022
The New Yorker
@NewYorker
·
Follow
Today, more than half of all abortions in the U.S. are medication abortions. Ordering pills in states that prohibit abortions will be unlawful, leaving women in those states to have to choose between risking their freedom and risking their health.
newyorker.com
Were Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. Were Going Somewhere Worse
We are entering an era not just of unsafe abortions but of the widespread criminalization of pregnancy.
10:38 PM · Jun 27, 2022
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/07/04/we-are-not-going-back-to-the-time-before-roe-we-are-going-somewhere-worse
No paywall
https://archive.ph/8a8Ke
In the weeks since a draft of the Supreme Courts decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organizationa case about a Mississippi law that bans abortion after fifteen weeks, with some health-related exceptions but none for rape or incestwas leaked, a slogan has been revived: We wont go back. It has been chanted at marches, defiantly but also somewhat awkwardly, given that this is plainly an era of repression and regression, in which abortion rights are not the only rights disappearing. Now that the Supreme Court has issued its final decision, overturning Roe v. Wade and removing the constitutional right to abortion, insuring that abortion will become illegal or highly restricted in twenty states, the slogan sounds almost divorced from realityan indication, perhaps, of how difficult it has become to comprehend the power and the right-wing extremism of the current Supreme Court.
Support for abortion has never been higher, with more than two-thirds of Americans in favor of retaining Roe, and fifty-seven per cent affirming a womans right to abortion for any reason. Even so, there are Republican officials who have made it clear that they will attempt to pass a federal ban on abortion if and when they control both chambers of Congress and the Presidency. Anyone who can get pregnant must now face the reality that half of the country is in the hands of legislators who believe that your personhood and autonomy are conditionalwho believe that, if you are impregnated by another person, under any circumstance, you have a legal and moral duty to undergo pregnancy, delivery, and, in all likelihood, two decades or more of caregiving, no matter the permanent and potentially devastating consequences for your body, your heart, your mind, your family, your ability to put food on the table, your plans, your aspirations, your life.
We wont go backits an inadequate rallying cry, prompted only by events that belie its message. But it is true in at least one sense. The future that we now inhabit will not resemble the past before Roe, when women sought out illegal abortions and not infrequently found death. The principal danger now lies elsewhere, and arguably reaches further. We have entered an era not of unsafe abortion but of widespread state surveillance and criminalizationof pregnant women, certainly, but also of doctors and pharmacists and clinic staffers and volunteers and friends and family members, of anyone who comes into meaningful contact with a pregnancy that does not end in a healthy birth. Those who argue that this decision wont actually change things muchan instinct youll find on both sides of the political divideare blind to the ways in which state-level anti-abortion crusades have already turned pregnancy into punishment, and the ways in which the situation is poised to become much worse.
In the states where abortion has been or will soon be banned, any pregnancy loss past an early cutoff can now potentially be investigated as a crime. Search histories, browsing histories, text messages, location data, payment data, information from period-tracking appsprosecutors can examine all of it if they believe that the loss of a pregnancy may have been deliberate. Even if prosecutors fail to prove that an abortion took place, those who are investigated will be punished by the process, liable for whatever might be found.
*snip*
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We're Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. We're Going Somewhere Worse [View all]
Nevilledog
Jun 2022
OP
Merrick Garland put out a statement saying the states cannot pass laws that restrict the use of
PortTack
Jun 2022
#1
That isn't a "stance." It's an interpretation of current law. It's probably correct as of
Scrivener7
Jun 2022
#10
The author of this piece is right: the surveillance state this engenders endangers us all
Hekate
Jun 2022
#7
I'm trying to think of how my post-menopausal self can get involved in something
Scrivener7
Jun 2022
#11