Please help me understand something about Roe

[Ms. Toad]

56. Your analogy is appropriate -

and why I have said that any attempt to restrict travel for the purpose of engaging in interstate commerce (whether gambling or obtaining an abortion) is unconstitutional.

It is precisely because it will be hard to declare one unconstitutional, without the other, that I dont' believe travel restrictions will hold. That isn't to say that they won't try, and that it won't take years to sort out. Just that ultimately, state laws discriminating for/against residents of the state as to interstate commerce are unconstitutional under the dormant commerce clause.