Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

agingdem

(8,807 posts)

7. there is no way the J6 committee would have

Reply to Raven123 (Reply #4)

Wed Jun 29, 2022, 02:09 PM

Jun 2022

called an unscheduled hearing, put Hutchinson out front without massive amounts of corroborating evidence...and you can bet the committee is daring Ornato to testify under oath...if he lies (and they'll know if he's lying) that's perjury..

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Greg Sargent: If Ornato responds to Hutchinson under oath, he can be asked about her other claims [View all] highplainsdem Jun 2022 OP

I bet he is willing to lie under oath for Trump. redstatebluegirl Jun 2022 #1

Bet if he does, the J6 commitee has the goods to prove he is committing perjury. emulatorloo Jun 2022 #6

wryter2000 predicts wryter2000 Jun 2022 #2

WaPo article...no paywall Nevilledog Jun 2022 #3

Good point. J6 committee plays a good game of chess Raven123 Jun 2022 #4

there is no way the J6 committee would have agingdem Jun 2022 #7

He better tell the truth. Trump will not protect him. Emile Jun 2022 #5