General Discussion

PurgedVoter

(2,696 posts)

5. Two men talkin' bull with a pretty girl

Wed Jun 29, 2022, 05:03 PM

Jun 2022

Who doesn't think they embroidered the tale as far as they could? These are Trumpsters. One of them left the SS to take on even more duties for TFG. He was extremely trusted by TFG. In context, if TFG trusts a person to manage a wide range of issues, a lot of them delicate, just how much can we trust that person to stick to the truth? I would say that Trumps faith in him precludes the possibility that anything he ever says is ever true.

A person who witnessed TFG in action and then after time has passed, remained fully loyal to TFG is not a person you can trust to see or tell the truth.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cassidy Hutchinson's "hearsay" - The "excited utterance" exception [View all] MerryHolidays Jun 2022 OP

And just like that gratuitous Jun 2022 #1

Federal Rule of Evidence 803, setting out exceptions to the hearsay rule. rsdsharp Jun 2022 #4

Absolutely. Just after the hearing end yesterday, Jake Tapper interviewed Jamie Raskin MerryHolidays Jun 2022 #7

Here's what I think. Mr.Bill Jun 2022 #2

Thank you for the clarity on this "issue." Sogo Jun 2022 #3

Two men talkin' bull with a pretty girl PurgedVoter Jun 2022 #5

Exactly TheRealNorth Jun 2022 #6

The ONLY thing that makes me wonder is this: oldsoftie Jun 2022 #8

'Hearsay' is when a witness testifies about something they didn't see or hear firsthand, 70sEraVet Jun 2022 #9

Well, you have the situation where Hutchinson is giving them all of this information, everyonematters Jun 2022 #10