Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Eliot Rosewater

(34,290 posts)

1. Some of us got real fucking mad when we saw people

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 05:04 PM

Jun 2022

saying shit like "I will vote for her but I will have to hold my nose."

When they said that so EVERYONE could hear they convinced at least one person not to vote at all.

If you said this YOU are responsible. PERIOD

Oh, did you see the case they will hear next year that will allow red states to decide elections ANYWAY THEY WANT!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, the Supreme Court doesn't just want to be the highest court in the land, it [View all] Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 OP

Some of us got real fucking mad when we saw people Eliot Rosewater Jun 2022 #1

Aren't the red states all about state's rights? tinrobot Jun 2022 #2

States rights to take power from the Federal government. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #4

Their reasoning Zeitghost Jun 2022 #12

There has to be more to this. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #13

It seems pretty clear Zeitghost Jun 2022 #14

We'll see what our scholars come up with. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #15

What do you believe the founders had in mind? Zeitghost Jun 2022 #16

I know. The Right want to take us down a rabbit hole. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #17

The only real issue I see to decide Zeitghost Jun 2022 #19

The people would say no and it has traditionally been understood that way, Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #25

Doesn't tradition almost sound like precedent BunkieBandit Jun 2022 #34

I call textualism voo-doo wordsmithing, so, yeah. Baitball Blogger Jul 2022 #36

I'm not sure what you mean by fake electors? Zeitghost Jun 2022 #35

Are they? Baitball Blogger Jul 2022 #37

What is this Robert's Court you speak of? Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #3

A.k.a. the Roque Conservative Court. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #6

You could just go with the United States Roman Catholic Court at this point. Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #9

Yep. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #10

The "Racism is dead" one? czarjak Jun 2022 #8

Scalia warned us before he died. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #11

I've said it before.... SergeStorms Jun 2022 #20

Its hard to think of his little chuckle plimsoll Jun 2022 #29

Right! It's the Thomas court. plimsoll Jun 2022 #22

Personally, I give more credit to Alito, he emasculated Roberts with Dobbs. Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #23

That's true. plimsoll Jun 2022 #30

⚖️K&R⚖️ spanone Jun 2022 #5

✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Jun 2022 #7

It's already a done deal, unless............... HUAJIAO Jun 2022 #18

🦘J 'roobert's 'roopublican court🦘 bringthePaine Jun 2022 #21

I'm still wondering Mr. Evil Jun 2022 #24

Your last sentence is that his is, and they really are not hiding it Cosmocat Jun 2022 #26

I said some time ago that the court should be ignored Eid Ma Clack Shaw Jun 2022 #27

I'm seeing it as the exact opposite... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #28

Yeah, but this is voting LeftInTX Jun 2022 #32

As I see it, they boil down to the same thing... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #33

The court radicals may not have the votes BootinUp Jun 2022 #31