Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(52,636 posts)
37. Are they?
Fri Jul 1, 2022, 04:42 AM
Jul 2022

Try selling that one to the people who learn that the electors are not staying true to the vote.

Fake is fake. If it quacks like a duck, it's a duck.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Some of us got real fucking mad when we saw people Eliot Rosewater Jun 2022 #1
Aren't the red states all about state's rights? tinrobot Jun 2022 #2
States rights to take power from the Federal government. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #4
Their reasoning Zeitghost Jun 2022 #12
There has to be more to this. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #13
It seems pretty clear Zeitghost Jun 2022 #14
We'll see what our scholars come up with. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #15
What do you believe the founders had in mind? Zeitghost Jun 2022 #16
I know. The Right want to take us down a rabbit hole. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #17
The only real issue I see to decide Zeitghost Jun 2022 #19
The people would say no and it has traditionally been understood that way, Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #25
Doesn't tradition almost sound like precedent BunkieBandit Jun 2022 #34
I call textualism voo-doo wordsmithing, so, yeah. Baitball Blogger Jul 2022 #36
I'm not sure what you mean by fake electors? Zeitghost Jun 2022 #35
Are they? Baitball Blogger Jul 2022 #37
What is this Robert's Court you speak of? Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #3
A.k.a. the Roque Conservative Court. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #6
You could just go with the United States Roman Catholic Court at this point. Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #9
Yep. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #10
The "Racism is dead" one? czarjak Jun 2022 #8
Scalia warned us before he died. Baitball Blogger Jun 2022 #11
I've said it before.... SergeStorms Jun 2022 #20
Its hard to think of his little chuckle plimsoll Jun 2022 #29
Right! It's the Thomas court. plimsoll Jun 2022 #22
Personally, I give more credit to Alito, he emasculated Roberts with Dobbs. Thomas Hurt Jun 2022 #23
That's true. plimsoll Jun 2022 #30
⚖️K&R⚖️ spanone Jun 2022 #5
✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Jun 2022 #7
It's already a done deal, unless............... HUAJIAO Jun 2022 #18
🦘J 'roobert's 'roopublican court🦘 bringthePaine Jun 2022 #21
I'm still wondering Mr. Evil Jun 2022 #24
Your last sentence is that his is, and they really are not hiding it Cosmocat Jun 2022 #26
I said some time ago that the court should be ignored Eid Ma Clack Shaw Jun 2022 #27
I'm seeing it as the exact opposite... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #28
Yeah, but this is voting LeftInTX Jun 2022 #32
As I see it, they boil down to the same thing... Ohio Joe Jun 2022 #33
The court radicals may not have the votes BootinUp Jun 2022 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, the Supreme Court doe...»Reply #37