Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In It to Win It

(12,829 posts)

4. Not to be a downer but

Reply to brush (Original post)

Mon Jul 4, 2022, 04:51 PM

Jul 2022

the Court decides what is included in those 9th amendment rights as antithetical as that sounds...

These "originalist" tend to gloss over the 9th amendment. The 9th amendment doesn't exist to them at all.

They also tend to gloss over the last 4 words of the 10th amendment.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Uh-oh, SCOTUS original constructionists of the Constitution... [View all] brush Jul 2022 OP

'the rights not specified in the Constitution belong to the people, not the federal government.' elleng Jul 2022 #1

K&R onecaliberal Jul 2022 #2

I take it you didn't read the full opinion n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2022 #3

Meaning what? Be specific. brush Jul 2022 #5

Meaning SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2022 #12

He also mentioned a witch burning advocate of the 1600s... brush Jul 2022 #17

No, I don't concur with the decision SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2022 #19

IMO it's an unsound decision and won't stand for long. brush Jul 2022 #23

The answer to the problem is in your own post SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2022 #25

We agree. brush Jul 2022 #26

I agree I think In It to Win It Jul 2022 #27

Not to be a downer but In It to Win It Jul 2022 #4

That's my point. They're cherry picking amendments they... brush Jul 2022 #8

Their constitutional analysis is actually biblical fundamentalist analysis unblock Jul 2022 #13

Yes. In more earthier terms, they're FOS. brush Jul 2022 #15

Trenchant analysis, indeed! unblock Jul 2022 #21

I'm sure they interpreted that as... dchill Jul 2022 #6

Bingo. brush Jul 2022 #9

There is no mention of the words Deuxcents Jul 2022 #7

Correct. Those rights not mention belong to the people. brush Jul 2022 #10

The problem with the 9th amendment: unblock Jul 2022 #11

IMO it's hypocrisy and cherry picking of amendments. brush Jul 2022 #14

It's worse than that. It's "we have 6 votes so we can do whatever we want" unblock Jul 2022 #18

Yeah, they're actually running the country now... brush Jul 2022 #20

And you know what, OP? Mr.Bill Jul 2022 #16

Your last sentence is exactly right. They're not the best and brightest. brush Jul 2022 #22

these "strict constructionists" consider that the people exercise these rights by rampartc Jul 2022 #24

We fought a revolution against a king's arbitrary rule and now we Hassler Jul 2022 #28

Yes. Life-time appointments mean we live with what we get... brush Jul 2022 #29