Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: A contradiction? [View all]

gab13by13

(33,072 posts)
1. Except, Merrick Garland has a record that can be looked at.
Thu Jul 7, 2022, 09:00 AM
Jul 2022

He chose not to indict "individual one," not to indict Trump for 10 obstruction of justice crimes, not to indict for witness tampering.

Merrick Garland allowed a bogus pro-Trump Cyber Ninja company have access to ballots, voter information, and election material and equipment all in violation of Title 52 of the federal election code. Garland's non action (just a stern letter) allowed the Big Lie to spread, allowed more fraudits to spread across the country. Those are examples of Merrick Garland's non actions. The statute of limitations has run out on the cases I cited.

Yes, I have not given up hope that Merrick Garland will do the right thing and I believe that people like Adam Schiff and others on the select committee are pushing him to do the right thing. The problem is that time is not on our side.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A contradiction?»Reply #1