Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: A contradiction? [View all]
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
9. Can you be more specific?
Thu Jul 7, 2022, 10:11 AM
Jul 2022

-What are the circumstances of not indicting "individual one"?
-What is the evidence of Garland "choosing not to indict" Trump as per your post?
-Can you cite a specific section of Title 52 that may compel DOJ to not "allow" a company hired by the Arizona Senate Republican Caucus to examine the Maricopa County ballots?
-What are the legal instruments that would permit Garland, as the AG or otherwise, to "allow the Big Lie to spread" or "allow more fraudits to spread across the country"? Can you find the definition of "non-action" in any legal US code or precedent? Is "non-action" all you got?
-What are the statutes of limitation for DOJ to act on matters outside their purview?
-What is the evidence of people like Schiff "pushing" Garland in any consequential way?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A contradiction?»Reply #9