Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

spooky3

(38,203 posts)

10. It is IMHO integral to the doctor's potential lawsuit, which the story described.

Reply to TreasonousBastard (Reply #9)

Fri Jul 15, 2022, 01:33 PM

Jul 2022

Last edited Fri Jul 15, 2022, 02:11 PM - Edit history (2)

My point is that the AG’s saying he was “investigating” whether she failed to report this specific incident may not be clearly defamatory. But saying she “has a history” of essentially breaking the law definitely is defamatory if it is not true. So I want to know if it’s true. It’s already been proven that she reported the recent incident.

Here’s a better article from the IndyStar:

https://www.indystar.com/story/news/local/2022/07/14/indiana-attorney-general-todd-rokita-says-he-is-looking-into-ob-gyn-caitlin-bernard/65373487007/

“Rokita provided no evidence…” and “Bernard doesn’t have any disciplinary actions…”

NBC also posted a similar story.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Doctor Informed State of 10-Year-Old Girl's Abortion (NYT) [View all] Nevilledog Jul 2022 OP

Jesus Christ in a cardigan sweater-- it isn't bad enough a 10 year old gets raped, but now she and.. TreasonousBastard Jul 2022 #1

Isn't the problem with "a history of failing to report"? The Times didn't spooky3 Jul 2022 #2

I see zero reasons to give any credence to that smear. Nevilledog Jul 2022 #3

I don't believe it either, but NYT should have checked the records spooky3 Jul 2022 #4

Looks like they did. TreasonousBastard Jul 2022 #5

Where are you seeing that? spooky3 Jul 2022 #6

just above... TreasonousBastard Jul 2022 #7

That's about the specific incident involving the 10 year old. My point is that spooky3 Jul 2022 #8

I don't know why they "should". That was not integral to this story. TreasonousBastard Jul 2022 #9

It is IMHO integral to the doctor's potential lawsuit, which the story described. spooky3 Jul 2022 #10

Todd Rokita knowingly lied. dalton99a Jul 2022 #11

publication of a non-truth by a state A.G. is a reason for suspension! cloudboy07 Jul 2022 #12

Why would I ever BidenRocks Jul 2022 #13

...unless you were trying to shore up an insanity defense. Nevilledog Jul 2022 #14