Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
38. My wife can't buy crypto because of her regulatory responsibilities...
Tue Jul 19, 2022, 04:52 PM
Jul 2022

I would never consider buying it on my own. A politician (especially in Leadership) shouldn't need a rule to avoid an obvious risk of appearing to trade on inside information.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It should cilla4progress Jul 2022 #1
Don't like it at all Mike_in_LA Jul 2022 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Jul 2022 #3
If a Repuke did this, everyone would be shrugging their shoulders FakeNoose Jul 2022 #4
On the other hand blueknight73 Jul 2022 #11
+1 Celerity Jul 2022 #32
Exactly nt Raine Jul 2022 #36
Some Democrats would be screamed at just not any of the Leadership SunImp Jul 2022 #39
Republicans did it with early COVID PPE, pulled out of restaurant and other hospitality stocks. TheBlackAdder Jul 2022 #29
Yes they did and it was outright FRAUD FakeNoose Jul 2022 #31
Yeah, it's a bad look. AndyS Jul 2022 #5
The Rs have no power to amend bills in the House. former9thward Jul 2022 #44
Bad Look Baggies Jul 2022 #6
Thanks for the stock tip... Beachnutt Jul 2022 #7
lol 867-5309. Jul 2022 #13
My thought exactly! Native Jul 2022 #17
He's doing something legal? Yawn. onecaliberal Jul 2022 #8
As long as it's not due to inside information then Elessar Zappa Jul 2022 #9
That's what's tough about it 867-5309. Jul 2022 #24
That doesn't mean it's insider trading. Elessar Zappa Jul 2022 #26
What exactly is the actual concern? Torchlight Jul 2022 #28
Yeah, I think there was a lot of media buzz even before the bill was written. TheBlackAdder Jul 2022 #30
Put me down as who gives a rats ass. pwb Jul 2022 #10
Congress to try to increase semiconductor manufacturing... brush Jul 2022 #12
This really has to be made illegal. Voltaire2 Jul 2022 #14
+1 Celerity Jul 2022 #33
This is wrong Bettie Jul 2022 #15
Looks bad jonstl08 Jul 2022 #16
Not a problem. The bill is obviously public information. Anybody Tomconroy Jul 2022 #18
Not s crime, but a terrible look months before the election Raven123 Jul 2022 #19
This bill is mainly for chip fabs, and Nvidia doesn't fab its own chips zonemaster Jul 2022 #20
The House passed its version of the bill in February gratuitous Jul 2022 #21
Yeah Calculating Jul 2022 #22
Relevant to include that Nvidia does not manufacture chips Torchlight Jul 2022 #23
This is from the daily caller a right wing source and should not be posted here Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #25
Of course it should. No one else or their spouses can trade on inside information and beaglelover Jul 2022 #27
Was the purchase made before or after the bill was announced? Victor_c3 Jul 2022 #34
After. W_HAMILTON Jul 2022 #41
As long as it's above board, I'm alright with it Victor_c3 Jul 2022 #42
It hasn't passed the Senate 867-5309. Jul 2022 #45
GOOD!! Dems need money too! nt Samrob Jul 2022 #35
They have billions of dollars already Raine Jul 2022 #37
I really don't get the drive to be worth billions Victor_c3 Jul 2022 #43
My wife can't buy crypto because of her regulatory responsibilities... brooklynite Jul 2022 #38
Your post should be alerted on for smearing Democrats. W_HAMILTON Jul 2022 #40
Kelly Loeffler was caught red handed insider trading to profit off the pandemic Takket Jul 2022 #46
+1 Celerity Jul 2022 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nancy Pelosi's husband bu...»Reply #38