Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
16. I'm not understanding ...
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 05:22 PM
Nov 2012

the objection in the first paragraph seems to suppose that THAT glazier is the ONLY glazier in the town; but if so, or if all the other glaziers, don't have the time or materials to do the job ... how would the Good Shopkeeper be out of any money?

And why would the Good Shopkeeper's revenue stream be impeded because of a broken window?

Regarding your second paragraph ... again, I'm not understanding. The trade in services, in this Good Shopkeeper story is NOTHING like the money shuffling on wallstreet ... here the Good Shopkeeper is paying for a tangible service, the window repair; on wall-street investors are betting on what other investors will do.

So maybe, I'm not understanding what you are saying and you can explain your objections a little more clearly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The jobs number next mont...»Reply #16