Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There's one problem that the United States doesn't have [View all]Shermann
(9,002 posts)22. No other charity could just reinvest all their donations back into their organization
They are required to spend a certain percentage on actual charitable work in the natural world. The rest can go to legitimate business expenses including salaries.
Churches get away with doing what they are doing because they operate in the supernatural world. Their good deeds can't be quantified in real world terms.
These donations are really entrance fees. Prostitutes sometimes try to characterize their fees as "donations" (I'm told), but it never works with the cops.
Failing to pay your church "donation" can result in your eternal damnation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, but it's our money when they enjoy federal and State non-profit tax exemption benefits,
KPN
Jul 2022
#12
Ever notice how many churches there are in Brooklyn. But at least they're there's a lot of diversity
Walleye
Jul 2022
#2
No other charity could just reinvest all their donations back into their organization
Shermann
Jul 2022
#22
If wine tasting charities brought in over 100 billion, I'm sure the IRS would take a second look
Shermann
Jul 2022
#30
"The only thing blocking that from going through is the indoctrinated portion of the electorate."
Zeitghost
Jul 2022
#33
So, you've moved on from false equivalencies to dubious Constitutional references
Shermann
Jul 2022
#34