General Discussion

KPN

(17,512 posts)

13. I agree. Thanks.

Reply to AntivaxHunters (Reply #4)

Tue Jul 26, 2022, 07:39 AM

Jul 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AOC Gathers Support for Bill to Overrule Supreme Court's EPA Decision [View all] AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 OP

Great, but hardly unexpected in the House. I need to see that she has garnered Senatorial hlthe2b Jul 2022 #1

+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #3

It does a lot for us AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #4

People have been concerned about climate change for decades, not new. betsuni Jul 2022 #6

No they haven't AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #7

Blame Democrats! This is a forum for supporters of Democrats, who are environmentalists. betsuni Jul 2022 #9

They didn't do that. Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #15

No it hasn't, been an issue from the seventies. betsuni Jul 2022 #16

Climate change? In what alternate universe? n/t Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #18

I think you might be wrong here. Dems have been called boston bean Jul 2022 #20

Hey BB. Environmentalism has been around that long... Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #22

Wow, it's as if Al Gore never existed. He was the political pioneer Nixie Jul 2022 #25

+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #37

I mentioned him in another post in this sub-thread.. Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #48

Nixon with Clean Water Act, Carter pushing environmentalism, Al Gore talking about global warming betsuni Jul 2022 #21

The first two aren't about climate change... Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #23

But I saw the effect of the Clean Water Act. betsuni Jul 2022 #24

I think we're just defining it differently... Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #49

"Release of Fossil CO2 and the Possibility of a Catastrophic Climate Change" FBaggins Jul 2022 #33

+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #35

Huh? It was for many climate scientists, ecologists, botanists, biologists, and environmentalists. KPN Jul 2022 #42

Blame Democrats? AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #30

I agree. Thanks. KPN Jul 2022 #13

Then the young should be happy with all this current house has passed but died boston bean Jul 2022 #19

Yes, it's mostly for social media otherwise. Nixie Jul 2022 #5

I think it's important AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #8

Why is "punching down" on Democrats fine then? They are the progressive party. betsuni Jul 2022 #10

They're not punching down AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #38

It's the Supreme Court punching down, and it looks like we all better Nixie Jul 2022 #27

+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #32

Al Gore should run in 2024 AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #39

He's only slightly younger than President Biden FBaggins Jul 2022 #40

She doesn't have the votes in the Senate and knows this. If it could pass that is one thing. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #34

Lol. Pragmatism over perfunctory! Let's do nothing. Yay. KPN Jul 2022 #11

Pragatism works...it saves wasting time that could be spent getting the majorities needed for Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #36

How are you going to get those majorities if you are perceived as twiddling your thumbs KPN Jul 2022 #43

Bringing up votes with no chance of passing only makes you look weak...campaign on those Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #47

She doesn't have Manchin...so no. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #31

That wouldn't overrule the Supreme Court's decision - it would uphold it FBaggins Jul 2022 #2

Exactly. It's what is needed. Raven123 Jul 2022 #12

Excellent. That is after all the solution to this KPN Jul 2022 #14

I agree gratuitous Jul 2022 #45

Good, but it will be shot down in the Senate. Novara Jul 2022 #17

the old Coal Polka would be the dance tune for that Celerity Jul 2022 #26

so glad to see this being pushed, the optics are great for the midterms even if the Senate blocks it Celerity Jul 2022 #28

THIS. KPN Jul 2022 #44

First, writer Sharon Zhang needs a civics class. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2022 #29

Thank you! This is something that I think is getting missed Amishman Jul 2022 #46

Thank you PhylliPretzel Jul 2022 #41