Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,783 posts)
29. First, writer Sharon Zhang needs a civics class.
Tue Jul 26, 2022, 09:06 AM
Jul 2022
I applaud this legislation and its eventual effects.

Using the term "Overrule" is misleading and damaging to reader's understanding of our government. It implies that Congress maintains superiority over the Supreme Court. It does not. SCOTUS is the final arbiter of laws, their effects and shortcomings and over incidents of government overreach. When the SC decides that a law is unconstitutional, Congress does not have a "oh yes it is" comeback.

Parliamentary sovereignty (also called parliamentary supremacy or legislative supremacy) is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty and is supreme over all other government institutions, including executive or judicial bodies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_sovereignty

The Founders were very careful to balance the three federal branches such that one would dominate the others.

Giving the public the idea that Congress has that authority is real mistake.

In reality, the SCOTUS opinion is that, under current law, the EPA took action beyond its authority. I think we all see that the EPA should have that authority and Congress is passing implementing legislation to correct the deficiency in the EPA's powers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great, but hardly unexpected in the House. I need to see that she has garnered Senatorial hlthe2b Jul 2022 #1
+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #3
It does a lot for us AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #4
People have been concerned about climate change for decades, not new. betsuni Jul 2022 #6
No they haven't AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #7
Blame Democrats! This is a forum for supporters of Democrats, who are environmentalists. betsuni Jul 2022 #9
They didn't do that. Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #15
No it hasn't, been an issue from the seventies. betsuni Jul 2022 #16
Climate change? In what alternate universe? n/t Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #18
I think you might be wrong here. Dems have been called boston bean Jul 2022 #20
Hey BB. Environmentalism has been around that long... Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #22
Wow, it's as if Al Gore never existed. He was the political pioneer Nixie Jul 2022 #25
+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #37
I mentioned him in another post in this sub-thread.. Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #48
Nixon with Clean Water Act, Carter pushing environmentalism, Al Gore talking about global warming betsuni Jul 2022 #21
The first two aren't about climate change... Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #23
But I saw the effect of the Clean Water Act. betsuni Jul 2022 #24
I think we're just defining it differently... Violet_Crumble Jul 2022 #49
"Release of Fossil CO2 and the Possibility of a Catastrophic Climate Change" FBaggins Jul 2022 #33
+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #35
Huh? It was for many climate scientists, ecologists, botanists, biologists, and environmentalists. KPN Jul 2022 #42
Blame Democrats? AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #30
I agree. Thanks. KPN Jul 2022 #13
Then the young should be happy with all this current house has passed but died boston bean Jul 2022 #19
Yes, it's mostly for social media otherwise. Nixie Jul 2022 #5
I think it's important AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #8
Why is "punching down" on Democrats fine then? They are the progressive party. betsuni Jul 2022 #10
They're not punching down AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #38
It's the Supreme Court punching down, and it looks like we all better Nixie Jul 2022 #27
+1 betsuni Jul 2022 #32
Al Gore should run in 2024 AntivaxHunters Jul 2022 #39
He's only slightly younger than President Biden FBaggins Jul 2022 #40
She doesn't have the votes in the Senate and knows this. If it could pass that is one thing. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #34
Lol. Pragmatism over perfunctory! Let's do nothing. Yay. KPN Jul 2022 #11
Pragatism works...it saves wasting time that could be spent getting the majorities needed for Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #36
How are you going to get those majorities if you are perceived as twiddling your thumbs KPN Jul 2022 #43
Bringing up votes with no chance of passing only makes you look weak...campaign on those Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #47
She doesn't have Manchin...so no. Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #31
That wouldn't overrule the Supreme Court's decision - it would uphold it FBaggins Jul 2022 #2
Exactly. It's what is needed. Raven123 Jul 2022 #12
Excellent. That is after all the solution to this KPN Jul 2022 #14
I agree gratuitous Jul 2022 #45
Good, but it will be shot down in the Senate. Novara Jul 2022 #17
the old Coal Polka would be the dance tune for that Celerity Jul 2022 #26
so glad to see this being pushed, the optics are great for the midterms even if the Senate blocks it Celerity Jul 2022 #28
THIS. KPN Jul 2022 #44
First, writer Sharon Zhang needs a civics class. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2022 #29
Thank you! This is something that I think is getting missed Amishman Jul 2022 #46
Thank you PhylliPretzel Jul 2022 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AOC Gathers Support for B...»Reply #29