Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: AOC Gathers Support for Bill to Overrule Supreme Court's EPA Decision [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,783 posts)29. First, writer Sharon Zhang needs a civics class.
I applaud this legislation and its eventual effects.
Using the term "Overrule" is misleading and damaging to reader's understanding of our government. It implies that Congress maintains superiority over the Supreme Court. It does not. SCOTUS is the final arbiter of laws, their effects and shortcomings and over incidents of government overreach. When the SC decides that a law is unconstitutional, Congress does not have a "oh yes it is" comeback.
Parliamentary sovereignty (also called parliamentary supremacy or legislative supremacy) is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty and is supreme over all other government institutions, including executive or judicial bodies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_sovereignty
The Founders were very careful to balance the three federal branches such that one would dominate the others.
Giving the public the idea that Congress has that authority is real mistake.
In reality, the SCOTUS opinion is that, under current law, the EPA took action beyond its authority. I think we all see that the EPA should have that authority and Congress is passing implementing legislation to correct the deficiency in the EPA's powers.
Using the term "Overrule" is misleading and damaging to reader's understanding of our government. It implies that Congress maintains superiority over the Supreme Court. It does not. SCOTUS is the final arbiter of laws, their effects and shortcomings and over incidents of government overreach. When the SC decides that a law is unconstitutional, Congress does not have a "oh yes it is" comeback.
Parliamentary sovereignty (also called parliamentary supremacy or legislative supremacy) is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty and is supreme over all other government institutions, including executive or judicial bodies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_sovereignty
The Founders were very careful to balance the three federal branches such that one would dominate the others.
Giving the public the idea that Congress has that authority is real mistake.
In reality, the SCOTUS opinion is that, under current law, the EPA took action beyond its authority. I think we all see that the EPA should have that authority and Congress is passing implementing legislation to correct the deficiency in the EPA's powers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
AOC Gathers Support for Bill to Overrule Supreme Court's EPA Decision [View all]
AntivaxHunters
Jul 2022
OP
Great, but hardly unexpected in the House. I need to see that she has garnered Senatorial
hlthe2b
Jul 2022
#1
Blame Democrats! This is a forum for supporters of Democrats, who are environmentalists.
betsuni
Jul 2022
#9
Nixon with Clean Water Act, Carter pushing environmentalism, Al Gore talking about global warming
betsuni
Jul 2022
#21
Huh? It was for many climate scientists, ecologists, botanists, biologists, and environmentalists.
KPN
Jul 2022
#42
Then the young should be happy with all this current house has passed but died
boston bean
Jul 2022
#19
She doesn't have the votes in the Senate and knows this. If it could pass that is one thing.
Demsrule86
Jul 2022
#34
Pragatism works...it saves wasting time that could be spent getting the majorities needed for
Demsrule86
Jul 2022
#36
How are you going to get those majorities if you are perceived as twiddling your thumbs
KPN
Jul 2022
#43
Bringing up votes with no chance of passing only makes you look weak...campaign on those
Demsrule86
Jul 2022
#47