General Discussion

MarineCombatEngineer

(17,879 posts)

61. Are any of these trusted people currently inside the DoJ and know what's going on?

Tue Jul 26, 2022, 11:28 AM

Jul 2022

AFAIK, no one within the DoJ has said they were surprised by testimony coming out of the J6 hearings, only "reports" from outside the DoJ.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

101 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, the DOJ Has an Active Grand Jury Empaneled Regarding January 6 [View all] MineralMan Jul 2022 OP

Good set of hopes empedocles Jul 2022 #1

Yep, 'Hope' is sure doing some heavy lifting in this post. Shoeless Louis Jul 2022 #62

Well I have hope! Hope that I've been totally wrong about Merrick Garland. calimary Jul 2022 #64

The GJ is a good hint that something is happening PJMcK Jul 2022 #2

I, too, don't know how this will all turn out. MineralMan Jul 2022 #5

The DOJ has never been particularly communicative about its cases Warpy Jul 2022 #20

Actually there is more than one grand jury empaneled. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #3

Yes, so I have assumed. MineralMan Jul 2022 #6

Why assume? It's public knowledge. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #71

I don't presume to know how many grand juries are convened. MineralMan Jul 2022 #72

That is my understanding also LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2022 #93

They have SEVERAL grand juries related to Jan 6 Novara Jul 2022 #4

So it appears. MineralMan Jul 2022 #7

And the FBI has searched Clark's house and siezed Eastman's phone Botany Jul 2022 #8

Yup. Things have been happening. MineralMan Jul 2022 #9

The only reason we know id because someone photographed him near a courthouse, I understand Raven123 Jul 2022 #10

Yes, exactly. MineralMan Jul 2022 #13

When Garland investigated Timothy mcveigh cutroot Jul 2022 #11

That is a great example of how the DOJ is supposed to operate. MineralMan Jul 2022 #15

I just figured a DOJ that has been investigating wouldn't be shocked by Hutchinson's onecaliberal Jul 2022 #12

Yes. We're seeing the committee hearing on TV. MineralMan Jul 2022 #14

There were many reports that the DOJ has been shocked by the evidence being revealed by J6 witnesses onecaliberal Jul 2022 #16

Maybe I missed it, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #17

Reports from within the DOJ? MineralMan Jul 2022 #18

I suspect you've heard the reports. NO ONE said the reports were from inside. onecaliberal Jul 2022 #21

I see. So there is nobody at the DOJ who has said that MineralMan Jul 2022 #23

+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #26

Do you feel better now? onecaliberal Jul 2022 #33

Well, I read all comments to any thread I have started. MineralMan Jul 2022 #59

Are any of these trusted people currently inside the DoJ and know what's going on? MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Jul 2022 #88

The DOJ asked for the J6 transcripts DLCWIdem Jul 2022 #99

So, IOW, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #25

Confusing Rumors with Facts Is Common. MineralMan Jul 2022 #30

+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #31

If anyone in the DOJ is "shocked" by the J6 hearings, ... Novara Jul 2022 #43

Exactly!!!! nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #45

Indeed! MineralMan Jul 2022 #58

Me too. Never doubted it. Massive case Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #19

Nothing quells the constant naysaying at DU. wryter2000 Jul 2022 #22

True enough. MineralMan Jul 2022 #24

Ain't that the truth. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #28

Adam Schiff would be admonished by some here for questioning the DOJ's pace. n/t TeamProg Jul 2022 #32

In Adam's own words.. A J6 committee member. Someone IN THE KNOW! TeamProg Jul 2022 #40

QED n/t wryter2000 Jul 2022 #46

What is QED? n/t TeamProg Jul 2022 #48

Quod erat demonstrandum wryter2000 Jul 2022 #50

id quod probandum est TeamProg Jul 2022 #57

? re: latin quote eieio Jul 2022 #78

that which must be proved TeamProg Jul 2022 #80

eieio - that's a great moniker! TeamProg Jul 2022 #81

LOL! Snort! burrowowl Jul 2022 #96

That could very well be a little strategy. Novara Jul 2022 #49

I'm not a member of the "Because I don't see it, it doesn't exist" crowd. CaptainTruth Jul 2022 #56

No sane person would be. But have you ever, even once, coasted through a 4 Way STOP sign? TeamProg Jul 2022 #66

Parlor games for theoretical physicists..........Another brandy, Albert? jaxexpat Jul 2022 #98

Not my argument. Just a little insight into the TeamProg Jul 2022 #100

I had no argument and no point actually. Just a little fun with words and stuff. jaxexpat Jul 2022 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jul 2022 #90

I'm sure the DOJ is continuing to press for indictments. LudwigPastorius Jul 2022 #27

And the DOJ will indict Trump if they have a good case against him. MineralMan Jul 2022 #34

What we've been saying or complaining about the DOJ has also been expressed BY LAWMAKERS!! TeamProg Jul 2022 #29

Indictments come when there is enough hard evidence for them to be issued. MineralMan Jul 2022 #36

Of course! But that's not an argument, that's lecturing process. TeamProg Jul 2022 #41

I'm neither arguing nor lecturing. MineralMan Jul 2022 #42

Please watch the videos above. Democracy dies in darkness. n/t TeamProg Jul 2022 #47

I have seen those videos before. MineralMan Jul 2022 #54

Our "discussion" was only about what we all care to say about the DOJ's pace. Your response TeamProg Jul 2022 #60

Anyone can be a naysayer, even the Honorable Adam Schiff. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #63

Fortunately for Mr. Schiff, he wasn't doing that here. D U is a great place to exchange ideas but TeamProg Jul 2022 #69

This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Jul 2022 #87

The existence of the Grand Jury was confirmed back in April by WaPo and NYT Fiendish Thingy Jul 2022 #35

There are probably multiple Grand Juries, and perhaps MineralMan Jul 2022 #37

May not mean much at all wrt trump..... getagrip_already Jul 2022 #38

It may or may not. I do not know, MineralMan Jul 2022 #39

Eastman's phones and gear were seized by the DOJ. You didn't know that? TeamProg Jul 2022 #51

Yes, I knew that. MineralMan Jul 2022 #52

the telling backstory is that eastman getagrip_already Jul 2022 #82

That's one theory of the DOJ's planning. MineralMan Jul 2022 #83

Excellent observation, thank you for posting it! CaptainTruth Jul 2022 #44

Once again: Novara Jul 2022 #53

Yes. I rarely visit Twitter. MineralMan Jul 2022 #55

News people post links to their stories there, so it's another way to learn about hard news. pnwmom Jul 2022 #65

Sure. I just don't choose to use Twitter for that purpose. MineralMan Jul 2022 #70

It wouldn't matter if you were searching for old news. But reporters often first post pnwmom Jul 2022 #74

OK, but I'm not watching for news constantly. MineralMan Jul 2022 #75

That's what I'm saying. The Daniel Goldman tweet had a direct link to the WA Post story. pnwmom Jul 2022 #77

The WA Post first reported about at least one such grand jury in March. pnwmom Jul 2022 #67

Yes, I remember that. MineralMan Jul 2022 #68

KnR Hekate Jul 2022 #73

Keep the faith yobrault1 Jul 2022 #76

As you've seen, empaneled grand juries have been so ongoing that they've indicted ancianita Jul 2022 #79

You're absolutely right. MineralMan Jul 2022 #85

Do we know for certain Pence's Chief of Staff's GJ appearance was related to Jan 6? msfiddlestix Jul 2022 #84

K&R Blue Owl Jul 2022 #86

Yes they do.. Progressive dog Jul 2022 #89

Your polite way of saying Ishoutandscream2 Jul 2022 #91

I hope like hell that orthoclad Jul 2022 #92

I used to be on a Federal Grand Jury Sucha NastyWoman Jul 2022 #94

DOJ in right direction but pace and scope are in question. PufPuf23 Jul 2022 #95

K&R Just_Vote_Dem Jul 2022 #97