Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Stinky The Clown

(68,952 posts)
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 09:09 PM Nov 2012

You know. It is actually possible we will know the election winner on election night. [View all]

Some have speculated that the race, if it comes down to Ohio, as it very well might, it could be weeks before we know who won.

The repubican FuckerUppers have so FuckeredUp the voting rules in Ohio that a close race could be as nailbiting and frustrating as was Florida in 2000.

But consider . . . . while GreasyHair Mitch *H*A*S* to win Ohio, Obama can win without it.

How sweet would THAT be?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would be very sweet but elleng Nov 2012 #1
That would be sweet indeed! CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2012 #2
I damn sure hope so, Stinky.. Condem Nov 2012 #3
Some clues RomneyLies Nov 2012 #4
I like your metrics. longship Nov 2012 #5
The networks will not call it before all polls close Stinky The Clown Nov 2012 #7
i liked that "192" thread NMDemDist2 Nov 2012 #6
and it won't be, imo. elleng Nov 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You know. It is actually ...