Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,761 posts)
68. I think you forgot what YOU posted
Tue Jul 26, 2022, 06:02 PM
Jul 2022

that was being refuted.

Garland was the LEAD prosecutor of McVeigh and how he methodically did what he did in that role for that case most certainly will influence how he might recommend the handling of very public, very violent complex cases like what happened January 6.

But maybe you missed that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Get thee to the greatest page malaise Jul 2022 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author malaise Jul 2022 #2
K&R spanone Jul 2022 #3
yes neiljwollman Jul 2022 #4
Destruction sagetea Jul 2022 #5
"Destruction is loud, but creation is silent." ARPad95 Jul 2022 #27
Excellent reminder! pandr32 Jul 2022 #6
Exactly what I wanted to say! Cha Jul 2022 #7
Also the easiest convictions ever. Missing plates led to arrest. JanMichael Jul 2022 #8
So the McVeigh arrest was easy. But getting the evidence wnylib Jul 2022 #13
Just saying bad example. No harm in that JanMichael Jul 2022 #18
Not a bad example. The only easy part wnylib Jul 2022 #20
Because people driving without a tag who also have a gun Phoenix61 Jul 2022 #22
Game, set and match against the naysayers ... Trumpdumper Jul 2022 #9
I read an article recently, either on Huffpost or wnylib Jul 2022 #17
Thinking MAGA require rational justification ... krkaufman Jul 2022 #57
It's not about rational justification. wnylib Jul 2022 #74
Game, Set & Match? SoCalDavidS Jul 2022 #25
And those had one other thing in common.... getagrip_already Jul 2022 #10
Why would he resign? nt Phoenix61 Jul 2022 #23
end of term...... getagrip_already Jul 2022 #48
Physical Crimes RobinA Jul 2022 #42
Yes, I don't believe McVeigh Mr.Bill Jul 2022 #67
This. nt BlackSkimmer Jul 2022 #62
C'mon Merrick, let's go 4 for 4... Blue Owl Jul 2022 #11
Coming up! malaise Jul 2022 #26
Thanks! I needed that reminder. calimary Jul 2022 #12
But we didn't have social media (except for AOL) at the time... brooklynite Jul 2022 #14
Perfect reminder Novara Jul 2022 #15
I agree. ShazzieB Jul 2022 #31
Thank you Novara Jul 2022 #41
+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #46
I'm exactly where you're at, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #45
Yessssssss. It all conjecture at this point LakeArenal Jul 2022 #53
really true Bondor Jul 2022 #63
Garland is brilliant. It's gonna be a grand slam. Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #16
TYVM for this timely reminder, elleng Hekate Jul 2022 #19
Wait...he was the investigator on those cases? trof Jul 2022 #21
Yes he was. nt Phoenix61 Jul 2022 #24
Facts?! PJMcK Jul 2022 #28
What if they had video, audio and witness testimony of kacekwl Jul 2022 #29
Are people asking for leaks? 48656c6c6f20 Jul 2022 #30
Hate to point this out, but it's just a matter of time. dchill Jul 2022 #32
I know how you feel, dchill. calimary Jul 2022 #33
K&R, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #34
Not a great comparison. former9thward Jul 2022 #35
McVeigh was arrested for not having a license plate on the car he was driving BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #37
Jan 6th was 18 months ago. former9thward Jul 2022 #38
And I shouldn't even have to point out WHO was in charge of DOJ BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #40
Nothing you are saying relates to the OP or even the general issue. former9thward Jul 2022 #56
Your recitation of what happened with McVeigh BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #61
Reno? former9thward Jul 2022 #66
I think you forgot what YOU posted BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #68
He did do the investigation, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #69
The poster I replied to said Reno did the investigation. former9thward Jul 2022 #70
You're really nit picking here. MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #71
It is interesting the both you and the other poster are totally ignoring the Unabomber former9thward Jul 2022 #73
You are the one missing the point of the OP BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #76
I was not the one who claimed Garland was the lead investigator of the Unabomber case. former9thward Jul 2022 #77
Here we go again BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #78
exactly Grasswire2 Jul 2022 #39
+1, uponit7771 Jul 2022 #51
One fly in the soup...They never pinned down nor exposed the RW network which enabled McVeigh and Ford_Prefect Jul 2022 #36
This recent thread discusses that: sop Jul 2022 #49
Yep there had to be many more people involved yet roam free. JanMichael Jul 2022 #54
And a few who perhaps help pay for it, or enabled the events. Ford_Prefect Jul 2022 #64
Lester Holt's new interview with Garland malaise Jul 2022 #43
Kick mcar Jul 2022 #44
They were social outcasts with few supporters dalton99a Jul 2022 #47
This is medicine duhneece Jul 2022 #50
Both indicted in months, I don't think this OP helps Garlands case like the recs think it does uponit7771 Jul 2022 #52
Thanks for that. I think we all worry that the clock is running out. Martin68 Jul 2022 #55
And inthewind21 Jul 2022 #59
I'm thinking the plethora of evidence was probably helpful. jaxexpat Jul 2022 #58
Great 100% of maga idiots could get behind that RANDYWILDMAN Jul 2022 #60
K and R...Thanks for posting.. Stuart G Jul 2022 #65
Hopefully, that ship is still as tight Ruby the Liberal Jul 2022 #72
McVeigh didn't have any McVeighs on his jury prodigitalson Jul 2022 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»a reminder: Merrick Garla...»Reply #68