General Discussion

Just_Vote_Dem

(3,577 posts)

97. K&R

Reply to MineralMan (Original post)

Wed Jul 27, 2022, 06:44 AM

Jul 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

101 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, the DOJ Has an Active Grand Jury Empaneled Regarding January 6 [View all] MineralMan Jul 2022 OP

Good set of hopes empedocles Jul 2022 #1

Yep, 'Hope' is sure doing some heavy lifting in this post. Shoeless Louis Jul 2022 #62

Well I have hope! Hope that I've been totally wrong about Merrick Garland. calimary Jul 2022 #64

The GJ is a good hint that something is happening PJMcK Jul 2022 #2

I, too, don't know how this will all turn out. MineralMan Jul 2022 #5

The DOJ has never been particularly communicative about its cases Warpy Jul 2022 #20

Actually there is more than one grand jury empaneled. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #3

Yes, so I have assumed. MineralMan Jul 2022 #6

Why assume? It's public knowledge. gab13by13 Jul 2022 #71

I don't presume to know how many grand juries are convened. MineralMan Jul 2022 #72

That is my understanding also LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2022 #93

They have SEVERAL grand juries related to Jan 6 Novara Jul 2022 #4

So it appears. MineralMan Jul 2022 #7

And the FBI has searched Clark's house and siezed Eastman's phone Botany Jul 2022 #8

Yup. Things have been happening. MineralMan Jul 2022 #9

The only reason we know id because someone photographed him near a courthouse, I understand Raven123 Jul 2022 #10

Yes, exactly. MineralMan Jul 2022 #13

When Garland investigated Timothy mcveigh cutroot Jul 2022 #11

That is a great example of how the DOJ is supposed to operate. MineralMan Jul 2022 #15

I just figured a DOJ that has been investigating wouldn't be shocked by Hutchinson's onecaliberal Jul 2022 #12

Yes. We're seeing the committee hearing on TV. MineralMan Jul 2022 #14

There were many reports that the DOJ has been shocked by the evidence being revealed by J6 witnesses onecaliberal Jul 2022 #16

Maybe I missed it, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #17

Reports from within the DOJ? MineralMan Jul 2022 #18

I suspect you've heard the reports. NO ONE said the reports were from inside. onecaliberal Jul 2022 #21

I see. So there is nobody at the DOJ who has said that MineralMan Jul 2022 #23

+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #26

Do you feel better now? onecaliberal Jul 2022 #33

Well, I read all comments to any thread I have started. MineralMan Jul 2022 #59

Are any of these trusted people currently inside the DoJ and know what's going on? MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Jul 2022 #88

The DOJ asked for the J6 transcripts DLCWIdem Jul 2022 #99

So, IOW, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #25

Confusing Rumors with Facts Is Common. MineralMan Jul 2022 #30

+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #31

If anyone in the DOJ is "shocked" by the J6 hearings, ... Novara Jul 2022 #43

Exactly!!!! nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #45

Indeed! MineralMan Jul 2022 #58

Me too. Never doubted it. Massive case Joinfortmill Jul 2022 #19

Nothing quells the constant naysaying at DU. wryter2000 Jul 2022 #22

True enough. MineralMan Jul 2022 #24

Ain't that the truth. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #28

Adam Schiff would be admonished by some here for questioning the DOJ's pace. n/t TeamProg Jul 2022 #32

In Adam's own words.. A J6 committee member. Someone IN THE KNOW! TeamProg Jul 2022 #40

QED n/t wryter2000 Jul 2022 #46

What is QED? n/t TeamProg Jul 2022 #48

Quod erat demonstrandum wryter2000 Jul 2022 #50

id quod probandum est TeamProg Jul 2022 #57

? re: latin quote eieio Jul 2022 #78

that which must be proved TeamProg Jul 2022 #80

eieio - that's a great moniker! TeamProg Jul 2022 #81

LOL! Snort! burrowowl Jul 2022 #96

That could very well be a little strategy. Novara Jul 2022 #49

I'm not a member of the "Because I don't see it, it doesn't exist" crowd. CaptainTruth Jul 2022 #56

No sane person would be. But have you ever, even once, coasted through a 4 Way STOP sign? TeamProg Jul 2022 #66

Parlor games for theoretical physicists..........Another brandy, Albert? jaxexpat Jul 2022 #98

Not my argument. Just a little insight into the TeamProg Jul 2022 #100

I had no argument and no point actually. Just a little fun with words and stuff. jaxexpat Jul 2022 #101

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jul 2022 #90

I'm sure the DOJ is continuing to press for indictments. LudwigPastorius Jul 2022 #27

And the DOJ will indict Trump if they have a good case against him. MineralMan Jul 2022 #34

What we've been saying or complaining about the DOJ has also been expressed BY LAWMAKERS!! TeamProg Jul 2022 #29

Indictments come when there is enough hard evidence for them to be issued. MineralMan Jul 2022 #36

Of course! But that's not an argument, that's lecturing process. TeamProg Jul 2022 #41

I'm neither arguing nor lecturing. MineralMan Jul 2022 #42

Please watch the videos above. Democracy dies in darkness. n/t TeamProg Jul 2022 #47

I have seen those videos before. MineralMan Jul 2022 #54

Our "discussion" was only about what we all care to say about the DOJ's pace. Your response TeamProg Jul 2022 #60

Anyone can be a naysayer, even the Honorable Adam Schiff. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #63

Fortunately for Mr. Schiff, he wasn't doing that here. D U is a great place to exchange ideas but TeamProg Jul 2022 #69

This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Jul 2022 #87

The existence of the Grand Jury was confirmed back in April by WaPo and NYT Fiendish Thingy Jul 2022 #35

There are probably multiple Grand Juries, and perhaps MineralMan Jul 2022 #37

May not mean much at all wrt trump..... getagrip_already Jul 2022 #38

It may or may not. I do not know, MineralMan Jul 2022 #39

Eastman's phones and gear were seized by the DOJ. You didn't know that? TeamProg Jul 2022 #51

Yes, I knew that. MineralMan Jul 2022 #52

the telling backstory is that eastman getagrip_already Jul 2022 #82

That's one theory of the DOJ's planning. MineralMan Jul 2022 #83

Excellent observation, thank you for posting it! CaptainTruth Jul 2022 #44

Once again: Novara Jul 2022 #53

Yes. I rarely visit Twitter. MineralMan Jul 2022 #55

News people post links to their stories there, so it's another way to learn about hard news. pnwmom Jul 2022 #65

Sure. I just don't choose to use Twitter for that purpose. MineralMan Jul 2022 #70

It wouldn't matter if you were searching for old news. But reporters often first post pnwmom Jul 2022 #74

OK, but I'm not watching for news constantly. MineralMan Jul 2022 #75

That's what I'm saying. The Daniel Goldman tweet had a direct link to the WA Post story. pnwmom Jul 2022 #77

The WA Post first reported about at least one such grand jury in March. pnwmom Jul 2022 #67

Yes, I remember that. MineralMan Jul 2022 #68

KnR Hekate Jul 2022 #73

Keep the faith yobrault1 Jul 2022 #76

As you've seen, empaneled grand juries have been so ongoing that they've indicted ancianita Jul 2022 #79

You're absolutely right. MineralMan Jul 2022 #85

Do we know for certain Pence's Chief of Staff's GJ appearance was related to Jan 6? msfiddlestix Jul 2022 #84

K&R Blue Owl Jul 2022 #86

Yes they do.. Progressive dog Jul 2022 #89

Your polite way of saying Ishoutandscream2 Jul 2022 #91

I hope like hell that orthoclad Jul 2022 #92

I used to be on a Federal Grand Jury Sucha NastyWoman Jul 2022 #94

DOJ in right direction but pace and scope are in question. PufPuf23 Jul 2022 #95

K&R Just_Vote_Dem Jul 2022 #97