Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Democratic Lawmakers Blast Their Own Party for Boosting Election Deniers in GOP Primaries [View all]
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/07/dccc-peter-meijer-john-gibbs-election/July 31, 2022
Democratic Lawmakers Blast Their Own Party for Boosting Election Deniers in GOP Primaries
The DCCC is not God.
Tim Murphy
snip//
But the DCCC isnt just bolstering Republicans who arent very good campaigners or who might be poor fundraisersin Michigans third congressional district, its specifically spending money to boost John Gibbs, an election-denying Trump loyalist, over incumbent Rep. Peter Meijer, one of a handful of Republicans who voted to impeach Trump after January 6. Specifically, the DCCC has spent $435,000 on ads that call Gibbs too conservative for West Michigan and note that he was handpicked by Trump:
snip//
Meijer isnt happy about this, telling Politico that hes sick and tired of hearing the sanctimonious bullshit about the Democrats being the pro-democracy party. But interestingly, a number of Democratic members of Congress arent happy either, and theyve criticized the move publicly. New York Rep. Kathleen Rice, for example, called the use of campaign funds to help election deniers unconscionable. Minnesota Rep. Dean Phillips said it was just damn wrong.
On ABCs This Week on Sunday, New York Rep. Ritchie Torres joined the parade of Democratic critics, slamming the move as embarrassingly hypocritical.
We cannot credibly defend democracy and then prop up candidates who are an existential threat to the very democracy that were defending, Torres said. And in politics, when you try to be too cute and clever, it often backfires. The DCCC is not God. It cannot guarantee the outcome of the general election. And when you prop up a conspiracy theorist in a Republican primary, you run the risk of sending an extremist to the United States Congress, and thats an egregious misuse of Democratic resources.
snip//
But as weve seen over the last few years, it also matters what individual members of Congress say and do once they get there. There are costs to adding more election deniers and Trump acolytes to the chamberand to using money youve raised from grassroots donors to help them get there. In this case, elected Democrats vocal complaints about Gibbs are notable. After all, theyre the ones whod have to work with him.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic Lawmakers Blast Their Own Party for Boosting Election Deniers in GOP Primaries [View all]
babylonsister
Aug 2022
OP
Spending Dem donor dollars on Repugs is repugnant. It especially hurts down-ballot races where
allegorical oracle
Aug 2022
#2
I would never donate to anyone that boosts election deniers, including Democratic organizations.
femmedem
Aug 2022
#3
I can't donate to the DCCC while they do this. I'm sad and pissed about it n/t
Tom Rinaldo
Aug 2022
#4
Then I guess you are OK with GOP types winning? Trying to get an opponent you can beat is
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#8
This isn't a presidential election. And he would have been easy to beat if the 'but
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#17
There is very little polling on the house...I think we will hold the house due to Roe.
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#51
I choose the option of directly donating to Democratic candidates over allowing the DCCC
Tom Rinaldo
Aug 2022
#16
That is all very well and good...but some candidates do not receive sufficient amounts
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#19
Of course it is your choice where your money goes....And I merely point out we would
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#41
Make your choice but I consider it a bad choice. We could lose elections based on this choice
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#47
I remember when they elected a certain Senator from Missouri and a Senator for Alabama. It
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#14
That is exactly right. Hey, I hope it works. Of course, I am one who wants to win and I am
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#24
Personally, I prefer to purge Republicans...but he that's just me...a yellow dog Democrat.
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#20
Purging Republicans does not begin by donating to their campaigns, IMO.
Hermit-The-Prog
Aug 2022
#22
Sometimes it does...this tactic was use in Claire McCaskill's election. This has been done before.
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#26
There is no mention of the DCCC in this article...where does that come from?
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#27
I was looking at the candidates who were helped...and one caught my eye...Mastriano.
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#23
That is not true...the the side pays Greens to help them win to cut down our vote...there was a
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#46
Attacking Republicans is not funding Republicans...and getting the candidate you want has bee used
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#52
STOP! Stop giving Democratic party dollars to the repugs, period. Send them bootstraps. nt
Hotler
Aug 2022
#33
If they ads are calling out GOP extremist candidates, I really don't see the problem
LymphocyteLover
Aug 2022
#37
they call Gibbs "too conservative for West Michigan" & he was "handpicked by Trump"
LymphocyteLover
Aug 2022
#40
These are ads against their opponents...and it does two things...maybe we get a candidate who
Demsrule86
Aug 2022
#43