Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(33,424 posts)
15. The U.S. Senate historians disagree with you.
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 09:53 PM
Aug 2022

Using the filibuster to delay debate or block legislation has a long history. The term filibuster, from a Dutch word meaning "pirate," became popular in the United States during the 1850s when it was applied to efforts to hold the Senate floor in order to prevent action on a bill.

https://www.senate.gov/reference/Index/Filibuster.htm#:~:text=The%20term%20filibuster%2C%20from%20a,prevent%20action%20on%20a%20bill.

The Senate tradition of unlimited debate has allowed for the use of the filibuster, a loosely defined term for action designed to prolong debate and delay or prevent a vote on a bill, resolution, amendment, or other debatable question. Prior to 1917 the Senate rules did not provide for a way to end debate and force a vote on a measure. That year, the Senate adopted a rule to allow a two-thirds majority to end a filibuster, a procedure known as "cloture." In 1975 the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds of senators voting to three-fifths of all senators duly chosen and sworn, or 60 of the 100-member Senate.

https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/filibusters-cloture.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WOW!!!! Karadeniz Aug 2022 #1
Don't understand the initial need for filibuster or how they got around the constitution with it uponit7771 Aug 2022 #2
Gee, guess why, Medicare passed with the majority of senate votes, as was done since the Hestia Aug 2022 #7
thx uponit7771 Aug 2022 #9
The U.S. Senate historians disagree with you. former9thward Aug 2022 #15
Apples and Oranges - you are discussing filibuster, I am discussing floor votes and moving to Hestia Aug 2022 #16
The only thing you mentioned in your post was the filibuster. former9thward Aug 2022 #19
Doesn't have anything to do with the Constitution grantcart Aug 2022 #11
And Senate Majority leader also is not in the Constitution Historic NY Aug 2022 #13
or we get a Green Eggs & Ham Redoux (sp?) Hestia Aug 2022 #17
Fortunately, it only seems to be a hindrance for giants. Aristus Aug 2022 #3
Sad, isn't it! nt pazzyanne Aug 2022 #4
we had 66 seats and won 2 more in 1964. Hamlette Aug 2022 #5
20 of those "Democratic" seats were held by old-fashioned, yellow-dog, racist Southern Democrats Trumpdumper Aug 2022 #12
Know your dawgs - Yellow Dog is when you vote for anyone other than a R-GQP even a dog Hestia Aug 2022 #18
The cartoonist is the legendary "Herblock." Tanuki Aug 2022 #6
One of the greatest political cartoonists EVER. summer_in_TX Aug 2022 #8
GREAT stuff! Really feels good to see his work honored so much! calimary Aug 2022 #10
Oh, and it's a Herblock cartoon! ... electric_blue68 Aug 2022 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Spotted this today in a W...»Reply #15