Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

2naSalit

(87,969 posts)

12. It could be a few things that I can think of...

Reply to Laura PourMeADrink (Reply #5)

Sun Aug 7, 2022, 10:47 PM

Aug 2022

Last edited Sun Aug 7, 2022, 11:27 PM - Edit history (1)

It could be bullshit.

It could be that they have discovered that Meadows is likely cooperating with DoJ and any contact could cause problems like witness tampering charges.

There is no privilege for any of those clowns. Only if Biden allows executive privilege for -45 only, it does not extend to others. And there is no privilege if you are trying to not be held accountable for crimes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is Mark Meadows cooperating with the DOJ ? [View all] kentuck Aug 2022 OP

Someone in a skill position should be updating "Downfall", WheelWalker Aug 2022 #1

I stood in the middle of the highway and looked thataway. I saw *something* . . . . . . Stinky The Clown Aug 2022 #2

Trump won't quit talking to him Effete Snob Aug 2022 #3

IMO... He is not cooperating yet... Ohio Joe Aug 2022 #4

Hmm. Heard fg lawyers "discussing" exec privilege Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2022 #5

I think I heard the word "negotiating" specifically used? kentuck Aug 2022 #6

Interesting... From CNN... Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2022 #8

The 'negotiating' term came from... Ohio Joe Aug 2022 #7

But sounds like trump et al will drag out the legal question Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2022 #9

It's already been decided by the friendly SC... Ohio Joe Aug 2022 #10

Legally, documents and conversations are two different animals. former9thward Aug 2022 #15

The result will be the same... Ohio Joe Aug 2022 #17

If you read the decision that is not why he lost. former9thward Aug 2022 #18

That was there as well but... Ohio Joe Aug 2022 #21

I disagree - I guess we'll find out. Nt Fiendish Thingy Aug 2022 #20

What's your feel on subject? Do you think his claimed Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2022 #24

The court could hear the testimony in chambers. former9thward Aug 2022 #25

But what are the odds of "no criminality" in the request for executive privilege? kentuck Aug 2022 #26

Maybe. former9thward Aug 2022 #27

Agree. But just talking odds... There has to be a time Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2022 #28

It could be a few things that I can think of... 2naSalit Aug 2022 #12

Watch this PJMcK Aug 2022 #11

Thanks. 2naSalit Aug 2022 #16

Possibly the reason why he didn't get the Bannon treatment on his J6 subpoena tinrobot Aug 2022 #13

I consulted with the one person with the biggest stake in what he says. His response: DFW Aug 2022 #14

No need to negotiate privilege issues re: Meadows Fiendish Thingy Aug 2022 #19

From day one I believed Meadows would sing like a canary. fightforfreedom Aug 2022 #22

All I know is that Garland is going to malaise Aug 2022 #23

You know I do. He's been so quiet. Even today! eleny Aug 2022 #29