Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For many people Obama is not a "lesser evil." For the privileged, he can be. [View all]joshcryer
(62,536 posts)27. No where in my OP did I say that they did not hold other views.
Merely that they had reasons to support Obama that had a real and substantial impact on their lives. The idea that the "lesser evil" vote means that you have "political ideals" and following, those that do not consider Obama the "lesser evil" means that it is you and others here who believe that they are stupid for not seeing him as a "lesser evil."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
141 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For many people Obama is not a "lesser evil." For the privileged, he can be. [View all]
joshcryer
Nov 2012
OP
Yeah, but you don't throw out ACA and say that's "not a reason" to vote for him, do you?
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#9
I hate the individual mandate and I'm not willing to throw out the whole ACA to get rid of it
Zalatix
Nov 2012
#54
one thing maybe you should know, is that wealth does not necessarily = intelligence
quinnox
Nov 2012
#22
You are projecting. I never once said wealth = intelligence or poor = stupid.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#23
That's the way Obama supporters feel - we're being told we're stupid, not progressive. Ain't true
freshwest
Nov 2012
#94
McCain got 59% of the white male vote; not that much different than 53% of the white female vote eom
amborin
Nov 2012
#66
I even pointed out in OP how Cuba's preventative health was adopted by the US.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#48
No, I think that you misread the intent of the OP due to your own preconceptions.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#49
No where did I say that they cannot "understand the lesser of two evils" viewpoint.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#36
Enjoy your spoon fed corporate talking points and oil industry propaganda.
limpyhobbler
Nov 2012
#125
Never did I imply that the poor were stupid. You are just jumping on the bash OP bandwagon.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#45
Sure you did, the poor lack sophistication, the poor are governed by the harsh realities.
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#51
I didn't say they lacked sophistication. The social safety net does not rely on ones sophistication.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#55
So you don't get the adulation you have become accustomed to elsewhere when you come to DU?
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#63
You wrote about a group of which you are not a part in a manner some members felt condescending
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#71
I only tried to give people the perspective of those who do not think Obama is a lesser evil.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#79
You have to be privileged to think the Democrats are anything else than the lesser of two evils.
redgreenandblue
Nov 2012
#90
The political system is set up such that there will be two parties, and two parties only.
redgreenandblue
Nov 2012
#97
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment, WIC, food stamps and health care are not crumbs.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#109
Right so, one candidate who will slash those programs, and one who might cut them a little,
limpyhobbler
Nov 2012
#119
Being the lesser of "two evils" and not having a reason to vote for Obama are not opposites.
Ms. Toad
Nov 2012
#96
No secret I have been critical of Obama. Six months ago I was going to vote for a 3rd party.
Autumn
Nov 2012
#99
It's got to be incrediably tough for you & your husband to live on $15,160 a year!
Kaleva
Nov 2012
#121
There seems to be a diffence between democrat and liberal or progressive these days
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2012
#129
I disagree that it's a change/schism in Democrats across the nation, though.
woo me with science
Nov 2012
#136
Technically with the ouster of the blue dogs the Democratic party is more leftward than before.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#139
The Democrats and Republicans have always been a party of powerful interests.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#140