Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TomSlick

(13,094 posts)

9. It's like e-mails from a Saudi prince. It only takes one response to make it worth while.

Reply to brooklynite (Reply #8)

Wed Aug 24, 2022, 09:06 PM

Aug 2022

The difference is that campaigns cannot know how many small donors will not donate again because of the Saudi prince technique. I suspect a disproportionate percentage of Democrats recognize the technique and are not amused.

I don't respond to e-mails from Saudi princes either.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dear Democratic campaign fundraisers: [View all] TomSlick Aug 2022 OP

I'm sure the rant will get all the attention it deserves... brooklynite Aug 2022 #1

I am hardly a deep pocket funder. TomSlick Aug 2022 #6

" Angering micro-contributors cannot be productive." brooklynite Aug 2022 #8

It's like e-mails from a Saudi prince. It only takes one response to make it worth while. TomSlick Aug 2022 #9

No it doesn't take one response... brooklynite Aug 2022 #10

Perhaps. TomSlick Aug 2022 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author TomSlick Aug 2022 #7

I totally agree. I gave money in 2020 at the federal level MerryHolidays Aug 2022 #2

Ditto ditto ditto northoftheborder Aug 2022 #3

Donate using a Postal Service money order. pwb Aug 2022 #4

Same goes for those online "polls". madamesilverspurs Aug 2022 #5