Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redstatebluegirl

(12,855 posts)
29. The students I advised were in a five year program
Sun Aug 28, 2022, 03:21 PM
Aug 2022

that required another 3 years of internship before they could be licensed. Many of them were first generation students and had to work and borrow to make it.

What people do not understand is when I went to school states were still funding a large part of higher ed. Now it is a very small portion leaving the rest to be paid by tuition, fees and a percentage of research grants.

Those of us who work in Higher ed are not getting rich. Raises are few and far between. One problem is the business model many schools are using. A Vice President or Director for everything! I swear we have a VP in charge of the men's room! A bunch of them are former state politicians who are term limited. All of the. Are overpaid and under worked!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is offensive. nt DURHAM D Aug 2022 #1
THIS FalloutShelter Aug 2022 #6
It sure is. No way was weekly take home 800 dollars a week in 1973. jimfields33 Aug 2022 #26
Not to even mention today's higher interest rates, penalty fees, etc. the lenders charge Blue Owl Aug 2022 #2
I am a boomer and am more than happy that the many redstatebluegirl Aug 2022 #3
Me too. I paid off my $26,000 in loans. Had it been 10 times that much, rsdsharp Aug 2022 #20
The students I advised were in a five year program redstatebluegirl Aug 2022 #29
K&R onecaliberal Aug 2022 #4
Know what... I'm a "Boomer". FalloutShelter Aug 2022 #5
Amen DURHAM D Aug 2022 #19
Thank you. greatauntoftriplets Aug 2022 #28
Trashed. Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2022 #7
That average weekly wage of $873 for 1973 must be adjusted for inflation. Ocelot II Aug 2022 #8
Yes Timewas Aug 2022 #15
Starting salary for computer engineers Retrograde Aug 2022 #17
I just pulled out my 1973 tax return. DURHAM D Aug 2022 #16
Agreed ProfessorGAC Aug 2022 #31
Just got off family video call Tree Lady Aug 2022 #9
$873 a week in 73' ??? miyazaki Aug 2022 #10
That's obviously an error. There's no way. Maybe $230/week. BComplex Aug 2022 #11
LOL FrankBooth Aug 2022 #12
GenX here, very hgh inflation last 40 years on most things. Brainfodder Aug 2022 #13
I don't think anti-Boomerist propaganda should be banned here, but it is unethical gulliver Aug 2022 #14
Well, in 1973, wages were closer to $500 take home for most people. haele Aug 2022 #18
This boomer says nothing of the sort EYESORE 9001 Aug 2022 #21
Apologies to you and all; I was just trying to point out the insane inflation elias7 Aug 2022 #22
Boomer status is not a valid way to determine how one stands on, well, anything EYESORE 9001 Aug 2022 #33
Question. SalamanderSleeps Aug 2022 #23
It said Boomer not Boomers. 1973 was specific. JanMichael Aug 2022 #24
Meaningless stats unless all are adjusted for wages and inflation over time. Wingus Dingus Aug 2022 #25
I'm one of the Boomer generation Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2022 #27
Exactly! SalamanderSleeps Aug 2022 #32
These sorts of threads aren't helpful. llmart Aug 2022 #30
According To This, Average Annual Wage Was Under $7,600 Per Year ProfessorGAC Aug 2022 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #29