Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WHO decides what the SPECIAL MASTER can remove from the DOJ case? [View all]SheltieLover
(80,262 posts)48. ..."and said it was her "preliminary intent" to appoint a special master in the case. "
Not a done deal, not by a long shot.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WHO decides what the SPECIAL MASTER can remove from the DOJ case? [View all]
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
OP
I don't know for sure, but I think the SM will determine if there are privileged documents...
Thomas Hurt
Aug 2022
#4
If the SM is MAGA, if the MAGA judge is the one who appoints, then this is
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
#6
Probably, but that won't stop the Pig and his pet judge from playing games, she already is.
Thomas Hurt
Aug 2022
#37
Or, SM could say ALL of it is his, even though that is ludicrous, and they would have to
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
#10
Thanks, my mind goes directly to what is the most absurd thing they could do.
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
#23
As I understand it, the judge's statement was an invitation to doj & tfg's lawyers to submit reasons
SheltieLover
Aug 2022
#32
..."and said it was her "preliminary intent" to appoint a special master in the case. "
SheltieLover
Aug 2022
#48
Let's assume the maga judge who is doing something that is NEVER done, deciding after
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
#17
You are using common sense, truth, precedent, etc to make this statement.
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
#27
Unless a court SAYS those docs are those things, as absurd as that would be...or not?
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
#30
It was used in the Michael Cohen case, the Rudy Giuliani investigation, the Veritas investigation
onenote
Aug 2022
#51
The part people have to grasp is the red state officials who are going to refuse to certify
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2022
#57