Remember

[H2O Man]

48. I like and respect

you and your opinions. But I will point out that the "toy think ...." or "you're saying...." is the quickest route to dailure in ann 8th grade debate. I'm good with you expressing your opinion, and my expressing mine, without going there.

Now, picture if you will, living on the dead end of a seasonal dirt road in the wilderness. The one where my brother-in-law and his cousin were caught red-handed butchering one of the neighbor's beefalo. The one time a trooper took that road that year. A $20,000 fine. But forget that, I'm talking pigs now. Imagine trying to return an 800-lb boar -- smarter than most people, 9ncluding Trump's circle -- through the forest on a rocky mountain-top. Call it speculation, but I doubt that any other DUer had that experience. And in frustration and bruises, had to call my father-in-law, nasty bastard that he was. And I have witnesses about how extra mean and vicious he could be. But that day, he drove up a farm road, through the fields, and met me at the forest's edge. Then showed me the easiest way to return an 800-lb boar to its pen. I think Ringo's "It Don't Come Easy" applies to0 that.

Now, back to telling people what they are saying ..... I'm confident that a simple reading of my posts here, in this very conversation, included mention that the DOJ does have a policy of not indicting before an important election. I noted that Trump isn't running, but they may well be considering his involvement and influence to be a reason to wait until the 5th of November, per the Lennon qute art the top of the OP.

There are many possibilities. I believe that you have expressed your opinion that the DOJ won't do anything, as well as the idea that anything pther than an immediate indictment is somehow unjust. I fully agree that the first option may be correct. I do not think so, but definitely recognize that. But it isn't the only possibility.