Remember

[jaxexpat]

56. I plead Guilty: of fictionalized concepts for how justice works.

The key is, its what opened mine eyes, it's secret, right? This Grand Jury and its relationship to indictments. Until it actually happens we won't know what's happening. I get it. It's liberating, this clarity. I mean it won't even intimate its existence until it bursts forth as a fully grown indictment or fizzle away in the dark as a refusal to indict.
Fact is they could have already heard and rejected the DOJ's argument since sometime in early 2021. Except it probably didn't happen like that because of Garlands reputation for thoroughness. His tendency to delay until he's certain to convince the grand jury with the evidence of his case. How'm I doing so far?

And here I am wondering, haunted maybe, like most people I expect, if it would not be better for the mid terms if there was more openness about just what they're using as evidence that it takes 20 months and a televised congressional investigation to jumpstart the thing. Is Alfred Hitchcock directing this?