Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Farmer-Rick

(12,668 posts)
22. The only law they follow is their religious laws.
Tue Aug 30, 2022, 06:22 PM
Aug 2022

God talks them...

Not all of them, but at least 6 of them think they know how their super sky daddy wants them to decide the case.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe I'm wrong, but this seems like a signal. FalloutShelter Aug 2022 #1
Interesting... EndlessWire Aug 2022 #3
+1 2naSalit Aug 2022 #5
He doesn't offer up a great number of lines to read between. Harker Aug 2022 #9
And it's a good message; the right message. NM Grins Aug 2022 #20
He's a judicious man, certainly. n/t Harker Aug 2022 #24
I agree. Assume defensive posture. mjvpi Aug 2022 #21
The biggest indication of action towards Benedict Donald MarineCombatEngineer Aug 2022 #31
I hope it doesn't come to that but it would definitely be "a sign" as the saying goes. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Aug 2022 #32
Bravo. LakeArenal Aug 2022 #2
Most intriguing! calimary Aug 2022 #4
As it should be. LiberalFighter Aug 2022 #6
+++ agree. n/t iluvtennis Aug 2022 #16
Interesting. sheshe2 Aug 2022 #7
Something big must be coming down liberal N proud Aug 2022 #8
Hmmm... Snackshack Aug 2022 #10
A number of SCOTUS judges though think that they do not need to abide by ethical standards. cstanleytech Aug 2022 #11
The R SCOTUS Judges believe they are above the LAW. KS Toronado Aug 2022 #17
The only law they follow is their religious laws. Farmer-Rick Aug 2022 #22
Love this: Super Sky Daddy Better Days Ahoy Aug 2022 #34
A perception disorder that afflicts wnylib Aug 2022 #35
I also Rebl2 Aug 2022 #12
Huh? James48 Aug 2022 #13
Probably several dozen zipplewrath Aug 2022 #25
34 was the number I found Zeitghost Aug 2022 #33
Doesn't the Hatch Act already require this? FakeNoose Aug 2022 #14
Appointees? Yes except for certain circumstances (which he is apparently forbidding) BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 #27
I like it! nt Wounded Bear Aug 2022 #15
It's a point of integrity and honor in cleaning up the mess that TFG left vlyons Aug 2022 #18
What does this actually mean? quakerboy Aug 2022 #19
In the case of indictments, there may be many named people who show their homework? mjvpi Aug 2022 #23
Especially in the DOJ zipplewrath Aug 2022 #26
Yes, what you are missing in this is that wnylib Aug 2022 #36
Must be. But my thought was appearance vs reality quakerboy Aug 2022 #37
There is something else that I think you are missing wnylib Aug 2022 #38
Well, thats proper mysterious. quakerboy Aug 2022 #39
I'm thinking the founders, from their perspective of blissful naivety, jaxexpat Aug 2022 #28
Caesar's wife must be above suspicion Jack the Greater Aug 2022 #29
Good move Garland SouthernDem4ever Aug 2022 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Garland Bans Political Ap...»Reply #22