Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Andrew Napolitano: Why Donald Trump will soon be indicted [View all]
Hes not usually my go to legal analyst but he does sometimes make really good points, and this is one of those times. He does not mince words in this article. He says Trump absolutely will be indicted and that Trump has virtually no defense to fall back on. According to Napolitano, Trump is 100% fucked.
It gives me no joy to write this piece. Even a cursory review of the redacted version of the affidavit submitted in support of the governments application for a search warrant at the home of former President Donald Trump reveals that he will soon be indicted by a federal grand jury for three crimes: Removing and concealing national defense information (NDI), giving NDI to those not legally entitled to possess it, and obstruction of justice by failing to return NDI to those who are legally entitled to retrieve it.
But the Bush-era statute, the one the feds contemplate charging Mr. Trump with having violated, makes it a crime of obstruction by failing to return government property or by sending the FBI on a wild goose chase looking for something that belongs to the government and that you know that you have. This statute does not require the preexistence of a judicial proceeding. It only requires that the defendant has the governments property, knows that he has it and baselessly resists efforts by the government to get it back.
What will Mr. Trump say in his defense to taking national defense information? I cannot think of a legally viable one.
But the Bush-era statute, the one the feds contemplate charging Mr. Trump with having violated, makes it a crime of obstruction by failing to return government property or by sending the FBI on a wild goose chase looking for something that belongs to the government and that you know that you have. This statute does not require the preexistence of a judicial proceeding. It only requires that the defendant has the governments property, knows that he has it and baselessly resists efforts by the government to get it back.
What will Mr. Trump say in his defense to taking national defense information? I cannot think of a legally viable one.
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/aug/31/why-donald-trump-will-soon-be-indicted/
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And as soon as Mr. Biden was sworn in as President, all of tRUMP's authority disappeared, hence,
SWBTATTReg
Aug 2022
#1
One lawyer I follow online said that Trump trying to claim "executive privilege"
Dr. Jack
Aug 2022
#3
Makes sense in what that one lawyer said (the one you follow online). I think that the entire tRUMP
SWBTATTReg
Aug 2022
#5
I noticed that too. You're absolutely right, that the GOP has gone silent. And, to be honest w/...
SWBTATTReg
Aug 2022
#8
From what I've read, executive privilege goes with the office, not the person.
Lonestarblue
Aug 2022
#17
I agree. This is one of those cases that proves not all Republicans are equally bad or delusional
Dr. Jack
Aug 2022
#6
Just more evidence that TFG thinks the rules apply to everyone else, but NOT to HIM.
ShazzieB
Aug 2022
#23