Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dpibel

(4,019 posts)

5. Because the judge rejected the argument

Reply to Fullduplexxx (Reply #4)

Mon Sep 5, 2022, 02:15 PM

Sep 2022

The govt argued that, to the extent this is a Presidential Records Act case (which the Trump side kind of asserted), sole jurisdiction under that statute is in D.C.

Cannon rejected that argument.

Unless and until she is overruled by a higher court, that's the law of the case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can't the magat judge's decision be appealed and judge shopped to a less magaty judge [View all] Fullduplexxx Sep 2022 OP

It can be appealed. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2022 #1

Darn right! dpibel Sep 2022 #6

It can be appealed to the 11th Circuit, but that's very Trumpy too Marius25 Sep 2022 #2

If judge magat has no jurisdiction why is it binding ? Fullduplexxx Sep 2022 #4

Because the judge rejected the argument dpibel Sep 2022 #5

Actually, the DOJ argued that Section 2204e didn't apply here onenote Sep 2022 #10

Why didn't DOJ make that argument if it was so clear. onenote Sep 2022 #8

Judge rso Sep 2022 #3

I think a lengthy appeal is exactly what the rethugs are hoping for. CanonRay Sep 2022 #7

It will take longer to approve a SM, than to go over the Documents! bluestarone Sep 2022 #9