Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(55,133 posts)
26. it is literally in the title of the OP (and it is wrong anyway, she was addressed as Her Majesty,
Thu Sep 8, 2022, 10:42 PM
Sep 2022

not Her Royal Highness.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Highness#United_Kingdom

In British constitutional law, use of the style HRH or simply "Royal Highness" may only be conferred by letters patent and only to children of the monarch's son. It is typically associated with the rank of prince or princess (although this has not always applied, an exception being Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, who received the style in 1947 prior to his marriage to Princess Elizabeth but was not formally created a British prince until 1957). When a prince has another title such as Duke (or a princess the title of Duchess), they may be called HRH The Duke of ....

For instance HRH The Duke of Connaught was a prince and a member of the royal family, while a non-royal duke such as The Duke of Devonshire is not a member of the royal family, but is a member of the peerage. When Edward VIII abdicated the throne in 1936 he was granted the style and title, HRH The Duke of Windsor. The woman he then married became the Duchess of Windsor, but she was denied the style HRH. Edward for much of the rest of his life attempted unsuccessfully to persuade the crown to grant her the style.

According to letters patent issued by King George V in 1917, the sons and daughters of sovereigns and the male-line grandchildren of sovereigns are entitled to the style. It is for this reason that the daughters of the Duke of York, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, carry the HRH status, but the children of Anne, Princess Royal, Peter Phillips and Zara Tindall, do not. The children of the Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex, at the request of the Earl and Countess of Wessex, are styled as the children of an earl, and thus are known as Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor and Viscount Severn.

Under his letters patent, only the eldest son of the eldest living son of the Prince of Wales was also entitled to the style, but not younger sons or daughters of the eldest living son of the Prince of Wales. Queen Elizabeth II changed this in 2012 prior to the birth of Prince George of Cambridge so that all children of the eldest living son of the Prince of Wales would bear the style, returning to the position Queen Victoria had instituted in 1898.

There is no mention of younger living sons of a Prince of Wales, as a result of which the children of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Archie and Lilibet, are not automatically a prince and princess with the HRH prefix. On 18 January 2020, Queen Elizabeth II announced that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex would no longer use the style of His/Her Royal Highness due to their decision to step down as working members of the royal family, though they are still legally entitled to the style. On 13 January 2022, it was announced that Prince Andrew, Duke of York was no longer afforded the style, following a notorious lawsuit against him.

Letters patent dated 21 August 1996 stated that the wife of a member of the royal family loses the right to the style of HRH in the event of their divorce. Examples include HRH The Princess of Wales and HRH The Duchess of York whose styles changed to become Diana, Princess of Wales and Sarah, Duchess of York, respectively. These styles are in line with those of a divorced peeress.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nice. Civility in the US. Who'd a thunk it? LakeArenal Sep 2022 #1
It is the right thing to do, because it is the right thing to do, but also, it will drive the Qs Chainfire Sep 2022 #2
+1 peppertree Sep 2022 #16
I'm going to miss this Queen. Hugin Sep 2022 #3
Minority view: I mislike it. malthaussen Sep 2022 #4
foreign dignitaries Behind the Aegis Sep 2022 #5
Thanks for this info, Behind the Aegis. ShazzieB Sep 2022 #7
I'm surprised how much it has saddened me.... Blue_playwright Sep 2022 #8
Seems very fitting to me given who she was and our relationship to the UK. Behind the Aegis Sep 2022 #28
Awwww, that is incredibly touching! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #29
The flag wasn't dipped obamanut2012 Sep 2022 #6
I spent 30 Years in the Navy BOSSHOG Sep 2022 #9
Exactly. James48 Sep 2022 #14
And yet they display it BOSSHOG Sep 2022 #18
They don't either liberal N proud Sep 2022 #19
She was the titular head of one of our strongest allies. niyad Sep 2022 #13
She was HM not HRH... gagarux Sep 2022 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author niyad Sep 2022 #12
here Celerity Sep 2022 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author niyad Sep 2022 #25
it is literally in the title of the OP (and it is wrong anyway, she was addressed as Her Majesty, Celerity Sep 2022 #26
My apologies. I never looked at the title. niyad Sep 2022 #27
I saw several flags in yards and at businesses, also flying half staff. niyad Sep 2022 #11
Class act. Pepsidog Sep 2022 #15
The UK did the same for JFK nt. Pluvious Sep 2022 #17
Meanwhile EnergizedLib Sep 2022 #20
But what is "HRH" ??? DemocraticPatriot Sep 2022 #21
Her Royal Highness, which NOT what the Queen was called, she was addressed as Her Majesty Celerity Sep 2022 #23
Her Royal Highness. It's not a DU acronym. nolabear Sep 2022 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Biden orders fl...»Reply #26